Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz
I do think they should be held responsible for knowingly allowing falsehoods to be printed as news.

Additionally, maybe the subscribers should be reimbursed something. They forked over money in good faith to buy factual information... and did not get it.
5 posted on 09/09/2003 4:17:48 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tamsey; Grampa Dave; NYer; BOBTHENAILER; Paul Atreides; onyx; swheats; PGalt; skinkinthegrass; ...
I do think (the NYT) should be held responsible for knowingly allowing falsehoods to be printed as news.

Knowingly allowing falsehoods? That's putting it mildly.

The NYT claims it owns the global franchise for accurate news reporting. The aura of self-righteousness permeates every page.

To have allowed an incompetent like Blair to sit in its newsroom and to have published Blair's work without fact-checking seems to put a very large onus on the editors for misleading readers.

Deliberately ignoring its established editing guidelines to print Blair's "falsehoods" would make the NYT complicit in the deception.

The NYT treated their readers as if they were raising mushrooms, that is, they kept them in the dark and fed them lots of horse manure.

7 posted on 09/09/2003 4:32:09 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson