Skip to comments.
Spitting on their graves - Michelle Malkin
townhall.com ^
| 9/10/03
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 09/10/2003 12:12:02 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
09/10/2003 12:12:02 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
This chick is right on :)
2
posted on
09/10/2003 12:16:54 AM PDT
by
america-rules
(I'm one proud American right now !)
To: Sabertooth
ping
3
posted on
09/10/2003 12:17:10 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: kattracks
Wow, Michelle! Tell us how you REALLY feel!
4
posted on
09/10/2003 12:21:11 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Beware: the Chip is pissed.)
To: All
5
posted on
09/10/2003 12:21:14 AM PDT
by
Cindy
To: kattracks
Well that was brutally honest
6
posted on
09/10/2003 12:23:08 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: kattracks
Michelle is a gem.
To: kattracks
We're going to get a LOT of sugar coated tributes to 9-11 but no real action to make this country safer and more secure in its aftermath.
8
posted on
09/10/2003 12:28:58 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
I'm still stuck on the Democratic presidential hopefuls attempting to speak Spanish!!
To: fight_truth_decay
I wonder why they didn't attempt to speak Arabic.
10
posted on
09/10/2003 12:41:57 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: ChocChipCookie
RE your post #4
SHE JUST DID !!!!!!!!!!!!!
11
posted on
09/10/2003 12:52:00 AM PDT
by
omronnie
(Wish I could come up with something cute here to say like others seem to do. !!)
To: kattracks
If you have a Michelle Malkin ping list, I'd like to be on it!
Her writing certainly reflects that hers is an intelligent voice that should be heard in our national security debate! (Today's realities versus the fact that we even still have to debate our national security interests is another topic for another time.)
12
posted on
09/10/2003 12:55:18 AM PDT
by
Fawnn
(I'm proud to declare that my country has a LEADER!)
To: goldstategop
Does anyone here know of a way to forward a copy of
'Spitting on their Graves' to Rush, Ann Coulter, Hannity,
Glenn Beck, et al, to use as 'show prep' for the nation?
She hit it out of the ballpark with this one.
Also, can someone please keep bumping this thread to the top for the next couple of days, as I do not know how to.
13
posted on
09/10/2003 12:59:48 AM PDT
by
omronnie
(Wish I could come up with something cute here to say like others seem to do. !!)
To: All
^
14
posted on
09/10/2003 1:00:37 AM PDT
by
jla
To: kattracks
I'll say it again and it will probably be removed again. But Malkin hits the nail on the head.
Nothing anyone in government is really doing anything to protect our lives. I love Bush and he's trying, but he fails on many levels.
So as long as terrorist are going to kill us, I'm happy I'm in a place not likely targeted and I don't care if liberals in NY or LA or Seattle or San Fran or DC get the brunt of it.
If they aren't willing to do the job overseas and domestically to keep us alive, then I'm going to remain in an area where I'm confident I won't be attacked. Even if the BIG ONE comes with all out nukes, I'm only 40 miles away from deep caves and I'll take my chances.
15
posted on
09/10/2003 2:17:52 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: kattracks
It is not possible for a democratic administration to prevent future attacks on America.
Given what they represent in terms of illegals, profiling, licensing, and documentation, Homeland Security is impossible.
16
posted on
09/10/2003 2:29:13 AM PDT
by
xzins
(In the beginning was the Word.)
To: sarcasm
bttt
To: kattracks
Wow.
18
posted on
09/10/2003 2:50:20 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: kattracks
She seems to be in a bad mood today. \understatement/>
19
posted on
09/10/2003 2:51:04 AM PDT
by
FlyVet
To: xzins
It is not possible for a democratic administration to prevent future attacks on America.The barbarians who did it were allowed into the country. We certainly could have prevented their being here. We certainly can keep these people out. The government of the United States has made a choice to keep us at risk rather than protect us by doing what is required - keeping these people out of here.
As I have said, because the government WILL NOT secure the borders, they are FORCED to watch everyone like Big Brother.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson