I'm not accusing you of being from DU but I am accusing you of offering no substantive arguments at all (which is kind of the calling card of a liberal). You paint this colorful imagery of Bush going from "Glorious victor" to "bumbling appeaser" but you don't talk about any facts. The change you describe happened only in your mind.
I have two words to back up my contentions: Road Map. The Road Map (actually an EU, UN, State Dept. concoction) was Bush's effort to appease the Saudis by creating a Palestinian State (on the ruins of Israel). During this stage, the State Dept. was actually negotiating with Hamas using Egypt as the intermediary. How well did that turn out? The left has been baying for at least a month about how we need to go to the UN over Iraq. What does Bush do? He goes to the UN and becomes a laughing stock. The Rats laughed at him, the French, laughed, and so did the Germans. By trying to appease his enemies, he only damaged himself. Is there something here you don't understand?
Well this time you are citing actual events but you're still attributing intentions to them that are totally without evidence. You say that all the events you cited took place because of some intent to appease that only you are privy to. But the fact of the matter is that you haven't any idea why those things were done. You simply assume that they were done for whatever reason would show Bush in the harshest light. This by the way is another liberal hallmark...unprovable intentions. (Why did the chicken cross the road? To exploit the workers and line his corrupt pockets with kickbacks from the evil polluting corporations that are making us slaves and destroying the world.)
Grow up.