THE DEBATE! DID YOU SEE WHAT I SAW?

Dad / Chef / Author, CookingWithCarlo.vom ^ | Sept 12, 2003 | Carlo3b

[MegaSilver]

I can tell you who they are. They are blacks, public employees, single women who want their abortions, old people who want free drugs, enviomental wackos, trial lawyers, and gays.

I like the way Ann Coulter put it: "The liberal catechism includes a hatred of Christians, guns, the profit motive, and an infatuation with abortion, the environment, and race discrimination (or, in the favored parlance of liberals, 'affirmative action')."

[carlo3b]

If these guys go in front of the KKK next week, they will pander to them as well. They were black, a sub nation separate and apart from the way the rest of us think. Most of america is not like the audience that you saw and heard.
 

Pandering isn't what is sad or alarming.  It is the mindset, not only in the audience, or the stooges on the podium, it's the base of the Democrat party, approximately 28% of the voting public want to hear this stuff.  Don't kid yourself into thinking that that base of support is somehow deep in the bowels of the inner city.  No, no my friend.

The base of this despicable party is your next door neighbor, your kids teacher, your librarian, drug store cashier, and it too many cases your family Preacher, Rabbi, or Priest!

Furthermore, I know too many black Americans who think exactly like me, and they are horrified at the thought that they are being lumped with those bas#ards. This is not as simple as ...them, you know, the different ones... oh no, they are being brought into their web each and every day.. Do you want free prescription drugs?  would you like a raise in your S S check, WIC, Food Stamps, union contract, federal pay grade, teacher retirement plan, paid medical leave... NOPE, it ain't as easy as you think!
 

[aruanan]

Excellent, dude!

[carlo3b]

It is a real pity that there are such gulfs between or choices. One side drastically different than the other. Strangely it weakens the resolve of our own candidates, because the only option is so far afield from anything I could support. Our candidate therefore feels no real pressure to take any strong stand on controversial but vitally important topics.

Third party choices are too iffy, and seldom a sound option, because watering down a flawed choice is dangerous, as we have proven with Clinton.. No one having the welfare of their fellow Americans can risk losing to the other side in any important race..

[Quix]

GREAT POST.

Much appreciated. Wonderful quotes.

More truth than the collective mind of the HYPORATS could wrap itself around.

[Quix]

EXCEPT THAT WE ARE CHALLENGED IN THE SCRIPTURES TO BE ANXIOUS FOR NOTHING

and to only have awesome respect for Awesome Almighty God . . .

there's been PLENTY to be alarmed about for a very long time. And in recent years, it seems to have escalated geometrically.

And a great percentage of even conservatives seem to be clueless about lists of hazards in our era.

[OrioleFan]

The Republicans, for the most part, believe in the power of the people.

"Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th."

- Ronald Reagan

[christie]

A well deserved bump!

[Free_at_last_-2001]

...had a choice of whom they wished would win the next presidential election, which would the choose? - Evil votes democrat!

[MadelineZapeezda]

If Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong II, Adolf Hitler, or Joseph Stalin, had a choice of whom they wished would win the next presidential election, which would the choose? Any of the nine candidates vying for the Democratic nomination, or President George W Bush?

Spot on, Carlo. This needs to be repated over and over again.......should be featured in a commercial for Pres. Bush. Thanks

[dansangel]

Pro-conservative BUMP!