Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grand Old Partisan
Basically, only one person -- Tom McClintock -- will decide whether Arnold or Cruz is the next Governor. If McClintock stays in, he is in essence voting for Cruz.

Of course. Let's not kid ourselves that McClintock and his supporters wouldn't like to see Cruz as governor. That is their only goal.

12 posted on 09/12/2003 8:43:39 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Bush wins in 2004. I'll take any bet the Bush-haters want to offer me. Name your amount.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Texas_Dawg
you sound like a lyin' yellow dawg

go disrupt back at your DU home.....
21 posted on 09/12/2003 8:51:38 AM PDT by christynsoldier (Facta non verba! (deeds, not words...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Dawg
>>>Of course. Let's not kid ourselves that McClintock and his supporters wouldn't like to see Cruz as governor. That is their only goal.

I don't know if that's true and neither do you. But one thing is for sure. You and others want a liberal (RINO) Republican to become the next governor of California. That's not the objective of conservatism. The goal for conservatives, is to triumph over liberalism. A vote for Boy Davis, Bustamonte or Arnold, is a vote for liberalism and a vote against conservatism. A vote for any one of these liberals, danages the credibility of the GOP.

If Arnold was a moderate, it might be a different story. The fact is, while Arnold's politics are to the right of Davis and Bustamonte, he's definitely a left of center candidate and will govern even more left of center. Arnold's to the left of RINO's like Arlen Spector, Susan Collins, Lincoln Chaffey and Olympia Snowe. There are enough RINO's in elected office today. We don't need to be increasing their numbers and inflating the RINO population by electing another RINO to become California's next governor.

32 posted on 09/12/2003 9:00:36 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Dawg
Congratulations. You've just posted the stupidest pro-Arnold statement yet.

Some of us are just a little more concerned with what the candidate may actually do in office than what color his nametag is. That said, there are a lot of us McClintock supporters willing to vote for Arnold if need be to keep the office out of the hands of the actual Democrats (as opposed to Arnold who's merely 80% Democrat in his political stances); however, to keep harping that McClintock should drop out before the debate featuring the two of them just shows absoute cowardice; or maybe a fear that when push comes to shove, Arnold will demonstrate a total capitulation to Democrat policies, thus wiping out all rationale for any Republicans to vote for him (though never fear, it will lure at least as many liberals his way). A Republican name tag in the office is not going to save the state.

56 posted on 09/12/2003 9:24:48 AM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson