.
1 posted on
09/12/2003 6:42:35 PM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
Just reading the name Villepin makes me reach for the Rolaids!
2 posted on
09/12/2003 6:45:25 PM PDT by
MEG33
To: GraniteStateConservative; AntiGuv
.
3 posted on
09/12/2003 6:45:50 PM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
Iraq would face "total chaos" if the United States surrendered to demands for a hasty U.S. transfer of authority to Iraqi control.. But isn't that what France wants?
To: Dane
France has something to hide when it comes to Iraq. I'd like to know what horror they've been involved in.
5 posted on
09/12/2003 7:00:01 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Dane
>> "the current path in Iraq runs "the risk of entering into a spiral with no return." <<
Just like old people in France.
6 posted on
09/12/2003 7:02:40 PM PDT by
sd-joe
To: Dane
I wonder if the Iraqi's will find out how badly the Frogs want America to leave Iraq.
Prairie
7 posted on
09/12/2003 7:14:36 PM PDT by
prairiebreeze
(I have several taglines stored in my attic. I just can't climb up to bring any down.)
To: Dane
Ivory Coast, French Indo-China, Haiti, Algeria, Languadoc, St. Bart's Day, Franco-Prussian War, Treaty of Versailles, 1930's secret treaties with Italy regarding Ethiopia, Syrian Mandate to name but a few.
The fruits of French diplomacy: Well fermented and totally demented!
8 posted on
09/12/2003 7:23:08 PM PDT by
sully777
(We have need of history, not to fall back on, but to see if we can escape from it--Ortega Y Gasset)
To: Dane
We only have to look to history to see what happens when the UN is in charge. It took Germany 45 years to unify after WW-II; and then there's Korea - another fine example of the UN's effectiveness.
9 posted on
09/12/2003 7:31:31 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: Dane
Screw France!
10 posted on
09/12/2003 8:00:38 PM PDT by
blam
To: Dane
The French just want their Baathist buddies back in charge.
11 posted on
09/12/2003 8:05:30 PM PDT by
Jorge
To: Dane
In an opinion piece in the French newspaper Le Monde, de Villepin wrote that a provisional government should be established in Iraq in a month, a draft constitution by the end of the year and elections next spring. Well it looks like France wants Saddam to return
13 posted on
09/12/2003 8:09:08 PM PDT by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Dane
France would do best to concentrate on keeping their people from dying of heat stroke.
To: Dane
Villepin and the rest of the Frenchies need to get off their penis envy kick and come to grips with the fact that they have ABSOLUTELY NO CLOUT, NO SAY AND NO RESPECT anymore. Either they fall in line to give legitimate help and in return receive some lucrative business opportunites, or get the hell out of our way!
15 posted on
09/12/2003 8:26:15 PM PDT by
demkicker
((I wanna kick some commie and terrorist butts))
To: Dane
Given the differences with the views of France and other countries, Powell predicted that the debate will be "spirited." You gotta love that old "spirited debate". That's diplo-speak for "somebody's mama's gonna get dissed...big time."
19 posted on
09/12/2003 8:49:38 PM PDT by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: Dane
Powell said Wednesday in an interview with Al-Jazeera, the Arab satellite network, that Iraq would face "total chaos" if the United States surrendered to demands for a hasty U.S. transfer of authority to Iraqi controlWhich is, of course, EXACTLY what the French want, either that or a rapid return to power of their freinds the Baathists.
Five Vital Lessons From Iraq (Paul Johnson)
Lesson I. We have been reminded that France is not to be trusted at any time, on any issue. The British have learned this over 1,000 years of acrimonious history, but it still comes as a shock to see how badly the French can behave, with their unique mixture of shortsighted selfishness, long-term irresponsibility, impudent humbug and sheer malice. Americans are still finding out--the hard way--that loyalty, gratitude, comradeship and respect for treaty obligations are qualities never exhibited by French governments. All they recognize are interests, real or imaginary. French support always has to be bought. What the Americans and British now have to decide is whether formal alliances that include France as a major partner are worth anything at all, or if they are an actual encumbrance in times of danger.
We also have to decide whether France should be allowed to remain as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, with veto power, or whether it should be replaced by a more suitable power, such as India. Linked to this is the question of whether France can be trusted as a nuclear power. The French have certainly sold nuclear technology to rogue states in the past, Iraq among them. In view of France's attempts to sabotage America's vigorous campaign to halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction, we need to be sure that France is not planning to cover the cost of its flagging nuclear weapons program by selling secrets to unruly states. Certainly Anglo-American surveillance of French activities in this murky area must be intensified.
23 posted on
09/12/2003 10:12:40 PM PDT by
Stultis
To: Dane
I think it is time for us (US) to go, "wink-nudge" to the Swiss and ask them if they had thought about expanding their empire in Europe lately.
47 posted on
09/13/2003 9:46:13 AM PDT by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: Dane
"We've done a lot of liberation in Europe after other Europeans had occupied parts of Europe," Powell said. Tell em France is next
76 posted on
09/13/2003 11:28:04 AM PDT by
woofie
To: Dane
"We've done a lot of liberation in Europe after other Europeans had occupied parts of Europe," Powell said. Tell em France is next
77 posted on
09/13/2003 11:28:19 AM PDT by
woofie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson