Skip to comments.
Gay dads want their son to grow up straight
The Sun-Herald, Sydney, Australia ^
| September 14, 2003
| By Candace Sutton and Larry Schwartz
Posted on 09/14/2003 2:54:25 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: Texas Eagle
ROTFLMAO
Cat is just a nice person who doesn't have opinions about others except those that have "opinions about others".
One must be Christ-like to have opinions about behavior don't you know?
Relativism is a wonderful thing....sort of like equivocating morality....the grease that keeps our indignation and guilt rolling along.
21
posted on
09/14/2003 3:40:48 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Roland will be missed by me.)
To: Byron_the_Aussie
Some have to come here to let everyone know how progressive they are.
22
posted on
09/14/2003 3:40:51 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: george wythe
Aspen and Saffron
To: Byron_the_Aussie
Boy Howdy Bump!
24
posted on
09/14/2003 3:41:42 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Roland will be missed by me.)
To: GreatOne
Sorry folks, you engage in abnormal behavior for your developmental behavioral disorder, and need counseling, not raising kids, to get you back to normalcy. Absolutely sickening. Brings to mind a story about the child of a woman I met once or twice... Woman dabbled in lesbian lifestyle for some years... Heard recently that her kid (teenager) was in jail for molesting young children... First thing I thought when I heard, was, "I hope she now realizes the impact that her lifestyle had on her kid." Too little too late.
25
posted on
09/14/2003 3:41:45 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: Trust but Verify
..why would they want them to be gay, so people like you can sneer at them and treat them as sub-humans all their lives?......there's no sneering at the fact of them being gay. There's justifiable sneering at the way they've behaved. How would you feel if one day Dad and Dad told you, 'we bought you over the Internet and took delivery in the States'?
26
posted on
09/14/2003 3:42:01 PM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Byron_the_Aussie
$75,000? A baby costs less than a Porsche? That's very, very frightening.
27
posted on
09/14/2003 3:42:02 PM PDT
by
Hildy
(SUCKER: Short-sighted Uncompromising Conservative Kool-Aid-drinking Elitist Republican.)
To: Byron_the_Aussie
At some point in time the child will want to know who his mother is, and pointing at that fellow next to you isn't going to satisfy that question. He has every right to know the lineage he comes from, not only for subjective reasons but for health reasons as well. This experiment in changing the God-given requirements of marriage and family is doomed to fail.
28
posted on
09/14/2003 3:44:17 PM PDT
by
man of Yosemite
("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
To: Paul Atreides
and to be indignant at those of us who have the gall to have views on behavior.
29
posted on
09/14/2003 3:44:35 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Roland will be missed by me.)
To: Byron_the_Aussie
.."do not consider her the boy's mother"
Whether they consider it or not she is...
30
posted on
09/14/2003 3:46:14 PM PDT
by
Zipporah
To: Hildy
..$75,000? A baby costs less than a Porsche?...Yep. And my guess, often bought for the same motivations. Note that unless otherwise stated the amounts quoted are in Australian dollars: about 0.65 to your dollar. Cheers, By
31
posted on
09/14/2003 3:48:07 PM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Zipporah
Whether they consider it or not she is... Not technically. IIRC, she was implanted with others' goods.
32
posted on
09/14/2003 3:50:47 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: All
33
posted on
09/14/2003 3:54:34 PM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Texas Eagle
I don't suppose you ever actually READ the Bible, did you?
Let he who is without sin....?
Lots of FReepers think they are without sin, I guess. Wonderful for them.
It didn't say "Let he who has LESS sin by their own reckoning cast the first stone..."
The gay people I've known were not obnoxious about it. So I don't hate them. Sorry about that.
34
posted on
09/14/2003 3:54:37 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(I have two daughters. I know peacemaking. What we're doing in Israel ain't it.)
To: wardaddy
Yes, we must be silenced or shamed, in the face of relativism.
35
posted on
09/14/2003 3:55:23 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: Trust but Verify
Why would they want them to be gay, so people like you can sneer at them and treat them as sub-humans all their lives?They are not "gay". They are two men who engage in homosexual acts. Homosexuality is not a condition or a state of being or a race of people. It is a behavior. An action. It's more of a verb than a noun.
I would compare it to being a shoplifter but I don't want to give you an aneurism.
But then, it's not even possible for me to "give" you an aneurism. So to hell with it. A shoplifter is not a race of people. It's a person who engages in a particular activity. In this case it's someone who shoplifts.
Should I call 911 for you?
36
posted on
09/14/2003 3:55:49 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Texas Eagle
Can I throw stones?
Yes. As long as you don't throw like a girl.LOL! Now THAT's funny.
37
posted on
09/14/2003 3:56:10 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: ChemistCat
Jesus never said "Since you are all sinners, you must never acknowlege your Father's definition of sin".
38
posted on
09/14/2003 3:58:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
"Exactly. Who on earth would choose to be gay?"
Hells bells, everyone on earth would choose to be gay. Only idiots would choose to be sad. On the other hand though, if your question is "Who on earth would choose to be homosexual?" The only rational response to your question would be: Only those homosexuals who swish around calling themselves gay.
39
posted on
09/14/2003 3:58:50 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Picture nine Dumbocrat Clowndidates exiting a Yugo clown car, as another arrives by broom.)
To: Byron_the_Aussie
SOAS
40
posted on
09/14/2003 3:59:02 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson