Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians
WorldNetDaily ^ | 9-15-03 | Vox Day

Posted on 09/15/2003 1:50:36 AM PDT by ambrose

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians


Posted: September 15, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Vox Day


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

"I have gone back and forth on Schwarzenegger, so much that I almost have whiplash. But my new – my current – position on him is: To hell with him."

– Jay Nordlinger, National Review

I like Arnold, the bodybuilding evangelist and the movie star. But I have no regard for Mr. Schwarzenegger-Kennedy, the evasive politician. He's a man of the people now – give him a little more time and he'll be feeling our pain and doing everything "for the children." Fortunately, it didn't take long for Arnold to destroy himself as a viable candidate in the eyes of thinking conservatives everywhere. He was already suspect, indeed, anathema to those of us who believe in principles over party.

But he damned himself even with the pragmatists, those who care more for power, party and position than principle, with his dismissal as "right-wing crazies" those who support Proposition 54, which bans the state's collection of racial statistics on the population. How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again?

The Republican enthusiasm for Arnold was initially based on his star power. It was nice, for a change, to see a Hollywood entity throw in with the GOP for once instead of barking mindlessly at it with the usual combination of vacuous accusations and cretinous insults. But his real support stemmed from his presumed electability, which sufficed to prevent numerous Democratic grandees from throwing their hats into the ring.

The problem is that the concept of electability is a massive crock of fumet. The Bush administration is demonstrating this truth in real-time, as its compassionate big-government neo-conservatism expands the federal leviathan at a pace faster than anyone since FDR. Would President Gore have been worse? Perhaps – but then there would be an opportunity to elect a man who actually opposed the rising tide of government in 2004 instead of surfing it like a cattle rancher gone beach-boy stoner.

Schwarzenegger, far from representing the salvation of California's Republican Party, stands for its complete immolation. He does not offer a philosophical alternative to California's self-destructive Democratic socialism; instead, he is a form of life-support for it. Instead of swearing to cut spending, he vows to beg more money from the federal government – demonstrating very clearly that this Republican is no republican!

Republicans in the state legislature have held their ground against the rapacious taxes proposed by Gov. Davis, and their obdurate political Manichaenism will allow them to do the same against Bustamante. But they will not be able to resist the same tax increases which would be proposed by a future Gov. Schwarzenegger. Furthermore, California Republicans will then be tarred by the same fiscal irresponsibility that now sticks only to their Democratic rivals, which, combined with their contemplated Schwarzeneggerian abandonment of cultural conservatives, will leave them wholly without a raison d'etre.

Pragmatism in politics is self-defeating in the long run. It is a euphemism for the slow sacrifice of one's principles. The constant substitution of "electable" moderates for principled conservatives is what repeatedly kills the Republican Party and prevents it from ever realizing even a small part of its platform when it is in power. It is particularly ironic when the electable moderates show themselves to be nothing of the sort, which in this particular case has already happened when the managing editor of the seminal National Review abjures the Great Teutonic Hope in no uncertain terms.

And those so-called Republicans who would drive a principled conservative like Tom McClintock from the race should hang their heads in shame. If they cannot fight for this candidate, they may as well abandon the battle altogether, for they are useless soldiers. It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento.

Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism.


Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian. He is a member of the SFWA, Mensa and the Southern Baptist Convention, and his weekly column is syndicated nationally by Universal Press Syndicate. He has been down with Madden since 1992.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: schwarzeneggerians; voxday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian.

Oh yeh, that combination always produces cognitive writings!
41 posted on 09/15/2003 6:25:40 AM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; Robert_Paulson2
The LA Times ran a story on Saturday reporting that Tom McClintock told Congressman Dan Burton that he wouldn't pull out, that he would be fine with a democrat win this time, as it will set him up to win in 2006.

I didn't believe it, as I am always unlikely to believe anything in the LA Times, but it looks like it's the McClintock supporters' talking point of the weekend.
42 posted on 09/15/2003 6:28:09 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (#213 of the 537.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
They are on to us....


43 posted on 09/15/2003 6:34:03 AM PDT by CheneyChick (Yes on Recall, No on Bustamante. JoinArnold.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; strela; CheneyChick; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; general_re; sinkspur

Sprites of earth and air --
Fiends of flame and fire --
Demon souls,
Come here in shoals,
This dreaded deed inspire!
Appear, appear, appear.

44 posted on 09/15/2003 6:43:00 AM PDT by dighton (NLC™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick; dighton

45 posted on 09/15/2003 6:48:04 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (#213 of the 537.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again?

Absolutely disgraceful comments. This guy is a piece of sh*t.

46 posted on 09/15/2003 6:50:42 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again?

Absolutely disgraceful comments. This guy is a piece of sh*t.

47 posted on 09/15/2003 6:50:46 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
I believe the point of this article is, if you vote for Arnold, you're going to hell. You also hate children and puppies.
48 posted on 09/15/2003 6:51:50 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Ha! Perfect!
49 posted on 09/15/2003 6:57:26 AM PDT by CheneyChick (Yes on Recall, No on Bustamante. JoinArnold.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dighton

50 posted on 09/15/2003 7:03:47 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Personal responsibility vs. big government interference.

"We want to make sure the mothers have affordable day care. We want to make sure the older folks have their care that they need. That everything has to be provided for the people." Schwarzenegger, CNN Interview

Whos pays for these things, tkathy? Arnold? The tooth fairy? Any ideas at all?

51 posted on 09/15/2003 7:03:51 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Hello? Hello? tkathy, are you there? Come in, tkathy . . . testing, testing, . . . one, two, three.
52 posted on 09/15/2003 7:08:32 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; EternalVigilance
I guess tkathy has gone away to mull it over for awhile.
53 posted on 09/15/2003 7:18:13 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
"We want to make sure the mothers have affordable day care. We want to make sure the older folks have their care that they need. That everything has to be provided for the people." Schwarzenegger, CNN Interview

What do you think, DOAIWJV, is this your idea of a "fiscal conservative" who will bring California and the Republican Party to new heights of glory?

54 posted on 09/15/2003 7:20:54 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry; tkathy
She probably has a job and a life outside of answering questions when you snap your fingers.

That's my guess.
55 posted on 09/15/2003 7:20:54 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Since you don't, answer the question for her.
56 posted on 09/15/2003 7:21:33 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I think that was an idiotic thing for him to say, and it is absolutely disturbing if he meant it the way it came out.

But he's still better than Bustamante.

I have something to do right now. Just letting you know, so you don't think I'm avoiding your brilliance if I don't answer your posts within a couple of minutes.
57 posted on 09/15/2003 7:22:58 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
You're looking for a fight this morning, quite obviously. I'm sorry, Kevin - not in the mood today. Maybe some other time.

And by the way: You need to get off people's backs and get your finger out of their chests. You might be able to persuade someone once in a while if you can manage that. Probably not, but maybe.
58 posted on 09/15/2003 7:25:26 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose
My advice is don't be coward and vote McClintock. Vote directly for Bustamante because that's who you will get.

And if you don't think it can get any worse under the Mexifornian Bustamante you are dead wrong
60 posted on 09/15/2003 7:29:21 AM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson