Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney Lectures Russert on Iraq-9/11 Link
NewsMax.com ^ | 9/15/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 09/15/2003 6:42:16 AM PDT by kattracks

After telling a national radio audience last week that there was no connection between the World Trade Center attacks and Saddam Hussein, "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert got an earful on Sunday from Vice President Dick Cheney, who outlined a mountain of evidence tying Iraq to the 9/11 catastrophe.

Recalling that he had told Russert two years ago that he knew of no Iraqi link to the attack, Cheney said Sunday, "Subsequent to that, we've learned a couple of things."

The Vice President contended that more recent evidence indicates "that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s, that it involved training, for example."

Though he did not specifically mention the South Baghdad terrorist training camp Salman Pak, where radical Islamists rehearsed 9/11-style hijackings on a Soviet-era Tupelov 154 airliner, Cheney noted that "al-Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved."

Cheney also cited reports of a meeting between lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta and an Iraqi in intelligence agent in Prague just months before the attacks, saying that U.S. intelligence has not yet been able confirm or discredit the information.

In perhaps his most startling remarks, the vice president became the first White House official to argue that there was a link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda's attempt to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993, telling Russert:

"We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in '93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of '93. And we've learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven."

The vice president might have also mentioned that Ramzi Yousef, who masterminded the 1993 attack and whose laptop computer contained plans to crash U.S. airliners into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, entered the U.S. with an Iraqi passport.

After his capture in 1995, the FBI flew Yousef over the World Trade Center and reminded him that his plan to destroy the Twin Towers had not succeeded. His reported response - "Not yet."

Last Wednesday Russert insisted to radio host Don Imus, "No one will say there was a direct involvement of Saddam Hussein in Sept. 11. ... There's no direct link that can be substantiated." The full exchange between Russert and Vice President Cheney on the evidence tying Iraq to 9/11 went like this:

RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?

CHENEY: No. I think it's not surprising that people make that connection.

RUSSERT: But is there a connection?

CHENEY: We don't know. You and I talked about this two years ago. I can remember you asking me this question just a few days after the original attack. At the time I said no, we didn't have any evidence of that. Subsequent to that, we've learned a couple of things. We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaeda organization.

We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in '93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of '93. And we've learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven.

Now, is there a connection between the Iraqi government and the original World Trade Center bombing in '93? We know, as I say, that one of the perpetrators of that act did, in fact, receive support from the Iraqi government after the fact. With respect to 9/11, of course, we've had the story that's been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we've never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don't know. [End of Excerpt]

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Bush Administration
Saddam Hussein/Iraq
War on Terrorism



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaedaandiraq; atta; cheney; iraq; saddam; youseff; youssef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2003 6:42:17 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BTTT
2 posted on 09/15/2003 6:43:58 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There are clear connections but those who refuse to look will never see. RATmedia will never report them.
3 posted on 09/15/2003 6:46:02 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The vice president might have also mentioned that Ramzi Yousef, who masterminded the 1993 attack and whose laptop computer contained plans to crash U.S. airliners into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, entered the U.S. with an Iraqi passport. "

Someone please refresh my memory.....when did we find this out about the laptop computers of Yousef's?

4 posted on 09/15/2003 6:48:43 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Whiners & PC'ers.......members of the new OFFENDED Political Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Including some people here.
5 posted on 09/15/2003 6:49:57 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Russert is losing credibility as he shows his partisanship more and more.
6 posted on 09/15/2003 6:51:11 AM PDT by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Someone please refresh my memory.....when did we find this out about the laptop computers of Yousef's?

About 1995.

7 posted on 09/15/2003 6:51:15 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Last Wednesday Russert insisted to radio host Don Imus, "No one will say there was a direct involvement of Saddam Hussein in Sept. 11. ... There's no direct link that can be substantiated." The full exchange between Russert and Vice President Cheney on the evidence tying Iraq to 9/11 went like this:

RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?

CHENEY: No. I think it's not surprising that people make that connection.

RUSSERT: But is there a connection?

CHENEY: We don't know.

Whats the beef? What's the difference between what Russert said on Imus and what Cheney said on MTP?

8 posted on 09/15/2003 6:55:10 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
You are correct about that.
9 posted on 09/15/2003 7:00:01 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
Russert is losing credibility as he shows his partisanship more and more.

Exactly where in the show did Russert show his partisanship. I watched the interview last night and if that was a Democrat official being interviewed we would have screamed about his being throw softballs. Russert wasnt argumentative, he let Cheney finish his thoughts without interupting him. He didnt force him to speak in sound bytes. The purpose of these programs is to ask those appearing tough questions. It's not to be a cheering section for one side or the other. Cheney hit home runs on just about every question, why whine about press bias?

10 posted on 09/15/2003 7:00:01 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
RUSSERT: But is there a connection?

CHENEY: We don't know.

I'm so glad that's all cleared up now. By-the-by, how does this equal a "lecture" by VPOTUS? Sound to me as if he was saying "We don't know" if there was a connection - how does this equal a statement of fact that there was a connection?
11 posted on 09/15/2003 7:05:05 AM PDT by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
I agree! I cheered with every answer our fine VP gave. Including the Halliburton questions.
12 posted on 09/15/2003 7:05:13 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I may hide, but I never leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
The purpose of these programs is to ask those appearing tough questions. It's not to be a cheering section for one side or the other.

UNLESS, of course, you are Hillary Rodham Clinton....in which case Russert melts like putty in her hands, smiling and giggling like a school boy with a crush on his Ashley Judd look-alike first grade teacher.

13 posted on 09/15/2003 7:05:19 AM PDT by nfldgirl (RE: Miguel Estrada's nomination....so much for "filibuster-lite.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
During the Dimocrat debates Kucinich and Dean repeated the same tired mantra over and over again:

"there was no link between Saddam and 9/11"

It's amazing to me how these liberals can find a conspiracy in every corner when it comes to corporate America or conservative Christians; but as far as terrorists are concerned, they assume innocence even in the face of compelling evidence to the contrary.

They are convoluted in their logic, and one need only look to our neighbors in California to see the inevitable mess made by the application of their philosophy.

14 posted on 09/15/2003 7:10:28 AM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Maybe I saw a different interview yesterday.

I was appalled when Russert showed figures on the economy the day President Bush took office and compared them to today. He never mentioned the effects on the economy of 9/11, corporate scandals, war in Afghanistan, war in Iraq, etc... Russert instead asks VP Cheney to look at the figures and asks "how can you run for re-election?" (how can you be such a moron Mr. Russet?)

Also, when talking about Iraq, he stated as fact:
1).There was no connection between Iraq and 9/11.
2).He stated as fact that the US was not at all welcomed as liberators.

Isn't it amazing that Timmy can know this as fact. I have read reports contradicting his facts.
15 posted on 09/15/2003 7:16:18 AM PDT by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Tim Russert suffers from Lingering Camelot Syndrome (LCS), but not as much as Chris Matthews. They are both waiting for a JFK Second Coming.
16 posted on 09/15/2003 7:21:55 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
I'm so glad that's all cleared up now. By-the-by, how does this equal a "lecture" by VPOTUS? Sound to me as if he was saying "We don't know" if there was a connection - how does this equal a statement of fact that there was a connection?

In an abundance of caution Cheney said "we don't know." He then laid out specific evidence of links.

17 posted on 09/15/2003 7:28:27 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Did you notice that when Russert talked about previous statements by Cheney about the deficit, the photos of Cheney that accompanied the text of the statements were both of Cheney scowling? Even Cheney commented on MTP's selection of such bad pictures.
18 posted on 09/15/2003 7:31:20 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Lingering Camelot Syndrome (LCS)

LOL, LOL ...........
19 posted on 09/15/2003 7:35:41 AM PDT by oh8eleven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Isn't it amazing that Timmy can know this as fact.

Dennis Millers' response during his interview was great on how it is to be a ex-liberal:

TAE: You’ve become more conservative over the years. How do you explain this shift?

MILLER: I’m not as sure of my guesswork anymore. To be on the Left, you have to be amazingly certain about things you’re guessing at,

20 posted on 09/15/2003 7:41:06 AM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson