[Burkeman1]

Contrast the hatred of Bush to that of Clinton. Clinton "haters" had literally dozens of identifiable, specific, and concrete reasons and issues to hold Clinton in contempt. Look at hatred the Dems have Bush. Nothing but cliches like "government of, by and for the ruling corporate class."

When Moyers says that Bush is attempting "a deliberate, intentional destruction of the United States way of governing," he offers no examples. Republicans could actually number the ways in which Clinton was underming the constitution- not with hysterics about the "paytriot act" and the ways it could be used wrongly- but with real examples of criminality and utter disreagrd for the law.

And when it comes to the war in Iraq (which I oppossed and continue to do) Democrats and liberal blow hards like Al Franken and Moyers were utterly silent during Clintons almost unbelievable abuse of the use of military power based on total lies in Serbia and his two wag the bombings in Sudan and Iraq (he bombed Iraq the night before the impaeachment vote!)

Liberals have zero credibility when it comes to critcizing a basically decent man like Bush while they defended the totally obvious criminility of the sociopath Clinton for 8 loooong years.

[Doe Eyes]

Clinton "haters" had literally dozens of identifiable, specific, and concrete reasons and issues to hold Clinton in contempt.

I just blows my mind those liberals can't see its all Clinton's fault.

[okie01]

We have our differences on Iraq, but that was an eloquent and passionate defense of the current Commander-in-Chief, in particular, and "Clinton-haters", in general.

It warrants applause. And I'm clapping...