To: Blood of Tyrants
He might have been in Clinton's camp, but I don't think a man becomes SACEUR without the career to back it up.
This guy is a serious threat in the upcoming election, and all we're doing is engaging in personal attacks? This isn't the way to defend our president, folks. People can see through partisan remarks. We need to look at this guy's policies and positions, and show people where he is out of touch with the American people.
I was sickened by the mudslinging and lies the RATS spewed out in the last two elections. We have the most popular president in modern history sitting in the Oval Office right now. Let's elevate the discourse and make this election a mandate!
To: van_erwin
This is hysterical.
15 posted on
09/18/2003 1:27:25 PM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: van_erwin
but I don't think a man becomes SACEUR without the career to back it up A general doesn't become POTUS without the career to back it up, and Clark doesn't have it. I've mentioned this on other threads: Clark is an unknown outside of DC. The press and the flacks don't understand this, because they do know him. The public will tolerate an unknown with a proven political track record (see: Clinton, Slick). They won't throw a general who commanded essentially an air raid on Kosovo into the White House.
18 posted on
09/18/2003 1:32:01 PM PDT by
Mr. Bird
To: All
Well, I guess I'll stop asking him to name the White House official who pressured him to say Saddam was connected to 9/11. GAIL won't let him answer.
Gee, if GAIL passed-on while general Clark was in the Oval Office who would become president?
To: van_erwin
President Bush should work to improve accountability
and clean up the some agencies which are nonfunctional.
20 posted on
09/18/2003 1:33:51 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: van_erwin
"He might have been in Clinton's camp, but I don't think a man becomes SACEUR without the career to back it up." Think again, he was a nobody until after his tanks help smash the branch dividian's in Waco.
30 posted on
09/18/2003 1:50:16 PM PDT by
Outlaw76
(Citizens on the Bounce!)
To: van_erwin
He might have been in Clinton's camp, but I don't think a man becomes SACEUR without the career to back it up. lets apply your logic to other important posts in the Clinton Administration.
She might have been in Clinton's camp, but I don't think a woman becomes Clinton's main squeeze without the career to back it up.
In both the case of Monica and Ashlie all they had to know is when to suck and when to blow.
38 posted on
09/18/2003 2:24:00 PM PDT by
Common Tator
(I support Billybob. www.ArmorforCongress.com)
To: van_erwin
Uh...yeah. Let's start with his policy on Iraq. Any idea what it is today?
61 posted on
09/20/2003 10:57:19 AM PDT by
per loin
To: van_erwin
Actually, the man had a very mediocre military career until he met the Clintons and became their pet general.
His stint as the head of Nato included almost starting WWIII by ordering an attack on the Russians at the Pristina airport. Fortunately the British officer in charge of the action, refused the order.
67 posted on
09/20/2003 11:43:05 AM PDT by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson