Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thtr
O.K. I've go to get in on this... Let's all just take a breath. If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...
56 posted on 09/20/2003 8:19:47 AM PDT by CAfraudPI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: CAfraudPI
If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...

One cannot present proof that one does not possess something. It is like saying, prove to me that you don’t own a Buick. No matter what you say, you could still have one hidden somewhere. It is impossible to “prove” that something does not exist. Saddam said he no longer had weapons of mass destruction. US intelligence said that not only did he have the weapons but there was a significant threat that he would use those weapons. We went to war to find and destroy those weapons. Now we can’t find any real evidence that they indeed do exist. We have been looking for them for 5 months (since the end of the major war effort). The UN inspectors looked for them for 6 months prior to that. If the US intelligence was so sure (enough to send soldiers into harms way) then where are the weapons?

60 posted on 09/20/2003 11:10:34 AM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson