Skip to comments.
Wesley Clark Tells AP He Wouldn't Back Iraq War (Another Flip-Flop)
AP ^
| September 19, 2003
| Mike Glover
Posted on 09/19/2003 2:42:16 PM PDT by Shermy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Dane
Maybe he should read a biography of Little Mac?
21
posted on
09/19/2003 3:04:37 PM PDT
by
dts32041
("Any priest or shaman must be presumed guilty until proved innocent."--RAH)
To: Shermy
Good 60% of america thinks Huessin supported terror and that he was a mass killer. They may get the details wrong, but they no evil when they see it. We ahve another much admired RAT who thinks the war was all wrong. He will make GWB look better every day. On top of that as a senior advisor to Klinton he makes that family look like the white trash they are.
22
posted on
09/19/2003 3:04:39 PM PDT
by
q_an_a
To: hosepipe
Whoever promoted Clarke should hunted down and exposed Try some of these in a search engine matched with Wesley:
"Jackson Stephens" "Axciom" "DARPA & Total Information Awareness" "george soros"
23
posted on
09/19/2003 3:05:15 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
He's not very bright. The clinton handlers told him that he was supposed to be against the war now in the run up to the primaries, and for the war next year in the run up to the elections, but he got it backwards.
Lies can be confusing.
24
posted on
09/19/2003 3:07:17 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Shermy
you want some fun... try a google of clark and gun control.
there's no there there. happy everyone. happy.
25
posted on
09/19/2003 3:08:51 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(shoot fast. shoot straight. shoot safe. practice. carry. molon labe)
To: dts32041
Maybe he should read a biography of Little Mac?The boxer in Mike Tyson's Punchout?
To: Shermy
Does Clark think he is such a media darling that he also believes that the press never publishes his remarks and every flip-flop? Sure, they may not call attention to it, but if people can read...
27
posted on
09/19/2003 3:10:25 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Cicero
Hitlery Rotten is not pleased that her pool boy is flubbing things up so early in the campaign.
28
posted on
09/19/2003 3:11:11 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Tarl
Yeah, and how can you not remember who you voted for?
He said he "probably" voted for Richard M. Nixon in 1972 and backed Ronald Reagan.
To: jimbo123
30
posted on
09/19/2003 3:15:32 PM PDT
by
Neenah
("It's always something !")
To: Sir Gawain
No the copperhead canidate in 1864.
31
posted on
09/19/2003 3:16:02 PM PDT
by
dts32041
("Any priest or shaman must be presumed guilty until proved innocent."--RAH)
To: Shermy
Wesley Clarke will be tightly scripted, same as Hilary. Only problem is his campaign staff of Bill Clinton hit men are still hammering out the script, with Bill Clinton's input. My prediction is the weekend after this is when Clark will be on all the Sunday shows rolling out his grand vision for America.
His obvious hook is he is the general who conducted the war on Serbia with minimum US deaths while GWBush has gotten us into a Vietnam quagmire. Ad nauseum he will go on about the coalition Clinton built to bomb Serbia while Bush the cowboy went in alone. Clark served in Vietnam so he can state this with impunity. Will be his talking points. Bill Clinton's bet is this war is GWBush's Achilles heel.
32
posted on
09/19/2003 3:20:19 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: Shermy; Peach
Here's looking forward to the gaggle of NewFreepersWhoClaimToBeConservativeButJustHappenToBePassionateAboutDefendingWesleyClark to show up in this thread and explain to us that Clark never really said what he really said or really meant what he really meant, and that we never really heard what Clark really said in the first place.
33
posted on
09/19/2003 3:21:42 PM PDT
by
AHerald
To: Dane
Not a single democrat has vowed to continue the war of terror. Why ???
34
posted on
09/19/2003 3:22:10 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: PISANO
Interestingly, according to the WSWS story on Clark, it was he who tried to pressure Clinton into war with Kosovo using the Racak Massacre as the pretext. According to them, Clinton first prefered to give Ramboullet a last try before launching the attack. It does fit his personallity as he was also the one who was discouraged with the orignal bombing plans saying they weren't aggressive enough. Soon after that, civilian infrastructure was brought into the equation.
35
posted on
09/19/2003 3:24:36 PM PDT
by
cwb
To: Diogenesis
Gee, how can we not vote for Clark? How else can we show our appreciation for the Waco barbeque, the Oklahoma City hoot nanny that bombed, Combat from thirty thousand feet, and the invention of the revolving door?
The best part is that whether we get Clark or whether we get Hillary, it will be just like getting four or maybe even eight more years of slick willie. This time we get three for the price of one, and not worth a cent of it.
I'm all for supporting four star generals-privates too-but only those who are on our side.
36
posted on
09/19/2003 3:26:02 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(When entertainers are no longer entertaining, they are nothing world class boors.)
To: Shermy
You see, it's ok when a RAT does the FLIP-FLOP bandango, but HOLY MANGO, if a pub would've backtracted on any stance, the liberal press WHORES would've been ALL OVER THE DUDE like flies on crap!! But because the flip-flopmen is a product of the BEASTfromNY it's ok!! Gosh I hate the liberal media whores!
To: Shermy
Some general he is, eh? Would've voted for a "diplomatic solution." I guess that's what Xlinton meant when he said that about a sack of guts.
38
posted on
09/19/2003 3:35:05 PM PDT
by
arasina
(Hillary thinks being shrill is the same thing as standing up for principle.)
To: Shermy; JohnHuang2; MadIvan; TonyInOhio; MeeknMing; itreei; jd792; Molly Pitcher; muggs; ...
39
posted on
09/19/2003 3:41:46 PM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
("There are none so blind who will not see")
To: Sir Gawain
General George B. McClellan, the Democratic candidate for president in 1864, was hampered by the party's plank calling for an end to the war, which was labeled a failure. He denounced the plank and was for the rigorous pursuit of victory. At first it appeared that he would defeat Lincoln, but Union victories in the field diminished the public's war weariness. Winning only three states, he resigned from the army on election day.
40
posted on
09/19/2003 3:41:48 PM PDT
by
SwinneySwitch
(The barbarians are inside the gates!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson