Skip to comments.
Vanity: Bennet, Bustemonte & Indian Casinos
self
Posted on 09/19/2003 3:59:14 PM PDT by pikachu
Help me figure this out:
Bill Bennet spent millions of dollars of money he earned gambling at Indian Casinos and he is the guy that writes all those books on virtues. he earnedthe money and could do with it as he saw fit.
Cruz Bustemonte receives millions of dollars from Indian Casinos and alte claimes he did not know they had special interests. He did with the money moved that even his part faithful find a little distastefull.
So, 1) Did any of Bill's money go to Cruz? 2) Would you come out of an Indian Casino with more money in your pockets if you went with Bill or Cruz? 3) Why would Indian Casios give money to Cruz when they could get more out of Bill and end up ahead?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: California
KEYWORDS: califronia; gambling
And finally, will tech jobs at Indian Casions be sent to India?
1
posted on
09/19/2003 3:59:15 PM PDT
by
pikachu
To: pikachu
Also didn't Lt. Governor Bustamonte SWEAR AN OATH to uphold our government and not TO SUPPORT THE VIOLENT OVERTHROW OF CALIFORNIA?
To: pikachu
BB spent his HIS money in Las Vegas and Atlantic City, not on Injun bingo, to my knowledge.
3
posted on
09/19/2003 4:01:44 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: pikachu
September 19, 2003
Floating above the fray
The next few days will be crucial to the campaign of Arnold Schwarzenegger if the Oct. 7 election date is restored by the courts. His one major remaining Republican rival, Tom McClintock, is about to benefit from television commercials paid for by the wealthiest interest group in California the Indian tribes who run gambling casinos. McClintock and all the other candidates, meanwhile, are combining forces to ridicule the actor for ducking all but one debate, and for choosing as his only debate one with a format in which the questions have been released in advance. His opponents either dont know or dont care that the format also allows for 90 minutes of free-flowing give and take among all the candidates, with all of them free to ask each other any question they like. The media have picked up on the everybody-ganging-up-on-Arnold theme, which is more fun to write about than the sort of serious political reform proposals the candidate offered Thursday in Sacramento. How Schwarzenegger responds to all of this may well decide the election, which remains a toss-up in independent polling. If he stays above the fray, laughs off the attacks and notes that his foes are being financed by the very interest groups he has threatened to sweep from the Capitol, it could solidify his campaign and win support in the days leading up to the election (if there is one). If, on the other hand, he attacks and snipes and whines about his opponents (as he did on Thursday), voters will likely see him as weak and partisan, not the kind of leader who can bring people together for the greater good of the state. It is truly extraordinary to see candidates from across the political spectrum, including a major Republican and major Democrat, working together to undermine one of their rivals. That seems, again, to play right into Schwarzeneggers hands, reinforcing the outsider persona that his own campaign has so far failed to emphasize. But as Reagan so often showed, words, gestures and body language matter at times like this. One example: I remember how Reagan almost never used the word Democrat when criticizing his opponents. I always assumed that this was because he wanted every possible Democrat to vote for him, and he figured that blasting the party by name would make its members defensive and less likely to support him. So he always said things like there are those who would undermine our security
or my opponents say
Schwarzenegger has his moments as a communicator, but he hasnt mastered that skill of using words that unite even as they define his differences with the opposition. With intense interest focused on his every move, his every word, he will need that skill in the next few days, and in the debate next week, if he is going to win this campaign.
Posted by dweintraub at September 19, 2003 09:18 AM
http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/insider/archives/000624.html
4
posted on
09/19/2003 4:02:37 PM PDT
by
Weimdog
To: Weimdog
Gah! My eyes! Paragraphs, please!
5
posted on
09/19/2003 4:05:42 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: annyokie
The next few days will be crucial to the campaign of Arnold Schwarzenegger if the Oct. 7 election date is restored by the courts. His one major remaining Republican rival, Tom McClintock, is about to benefit from television commercials paid for by the wealthiest interest group in California the Indian tribes who run gambling casinos.
McClintock and all the other candidates, meanwhile, are combining forces to ridicule the actor for ducking all but one debate, and for choosing as his only debate one with a format in which the questions have been released in advance. His opponents either dont know or dont care that the format also allows for 90 minutes of free-flowing give and take among all the candidates, with all of them free to ask each other any question they like.
The media have picked up on the everybody-ganging-up-on-Arnold theme, which is more fun to write about than the sort of serious political reform proposals the candidate offered Thursday in Sacramento. How Schwarzenegger responds to all of this may well decide the election, which remains a toss-up in independent polling.
If he stays above the fray, laughs off the attacks and notes that his foes are being financed by the very interest groups he has threatened to sweep from the Capitol, it could solidify his campaign and win support in the days leading up to the election (if there is one).
If, on the other hand, he attacks and snipes and whines about his opponents (as he did on Thursday), voters will likely see him as weak and partisan, not the kind of leader who can bring people together for the greater good of the state.
It is truly extraordinary to see candidates from across the political spectrum, including a major Republican and major Democrat, working together to undermine one of their rivals.
That seems, again, to play right into Schwarzeneggers hands, reinforcing the outsider persona that his own campaign has so far failed to emphasize. But as Reagan so often showed, words, gestures and body language matter at times like this.
One example: I remember how Reagan almost never used the word Democrat when criticizing his opponents. I always assumed that this was because he wanted every possible Democrat to vote for him, and he figured that blasting the party by name would make its members defensive and less likely to support him. So he always said things like there are those who would undermine our security
or my opponents say
Schwarzenegger has his moments as a communicator, but he hasnt mastered that skill of using words that unite even as they define his differences with the opposition. With intense interest focused on his every move, his every word, he will need that skill in the next few days, and in the debate next week, if he is going to win this campaign.
6
posted on
09/19/2003 4:31:26 PM PDT
by
4mycountry
(You say I'm a brat like it's a bad thing.)
To: 4mycountry
I can't vote for Arnold, but I find him very charismatic and thoughtful. He's not "pure", but who is? My 72 year old dad is voting for him and he is a practical man.
7
posted on
09/19/2003 4:36:38 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: pikachu
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
8
posted on
09/19/2003 5:21:13 PM PDT
by
DoctorZIn
To: annyokie
Complain to Weintraub.
9
posted on
09/20/2003 3:27:27 PM PDT
by
Weimdog
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson