[af_vet_1981]

"I do think that if they weren't born, they weren't citizens."

What a conveinent[SIC: convenient] presumption by those who prefer to treat the pre-born as though he/she were no more than a wart,mole or zit.

Not only are they not citizens, but they need diapers yet either.

The strange thing about all these word games, is that every human being in this country, whether here legally or illegally, has equal protection under our laws with our citizens. While the highest Court in our land, has declared open season on Pre-citizen Pre-borns, began by citizen parents.

Your imagination runs away with your thoughts.
The reality is that even preborn children are protected by most of their parents. There are fathers and mothers who want to kill their babies and it is legal until they are born, within certain boundaries, depending on the state. There is no "open season" as Scott Peterson has discovered.

It is a dispicable [SIC: despicable] thing you are defending.

I see you find reason threatening and cross wide gulfs of fiction in your leaps to conclusions.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Thanks for the spelling lessons.

"Not only are they not citizens, but they need diapers yet either." (Left out a don't or do not there didn't you?)

Are you saying that needing diapers makes one a citizen?

It "is" open season on the unborn, if the parents want them assinated and hire a hit man in an abortion clinic to snuff them. These parents are given the right to play God with the Pre-born.

Scott Peterson alegedly made the mistake of murdering a protected species along with, one of those little throw away people-thus the dual murder charges. Had an abortionist killed the tiny one, that would have been perfectly legal.

I find it humorous when supporters of abortion disdain the reasoning of pro-lifers. Talk about fiction.