Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio State's Maurice Clarett Sues NFL
ABC/ESPN Breaking News ^ | September 23, 2003 | staff writer

Posted on 09/23/2003 11:16:45 AM PDT by rftc

Suspended Ohio State tailback Maurice Clarett sued the National Football League today in an historic attempt to gain entry into the league.

Under the current rules, Clarett is not eligible for entry until 2005.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last
To: Stone Mountain
See #32. It's the same principle.

You have to buy the right to own a team from the NFL. You then have to share certain parts of revenue with other teams.

In essence it's one large corporation and the NFL has been slowly asserting that fact over the years in anticipation fo this. Take a look around the stadiums these days, lot's of NFL logos on the field etc.

Listen the to broadcast rights that are read at the end of the games "The exclusive property of (insert team name) and the National Football League."

He's gonna get waxed.

41 posted on 09/23/2003 11:37:27 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Minimum standard is three years out of high school, period.
42 posted on 09/23/2003 11:38:15 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I really have a distaste for how the Clarett family have handled the media through Jim Brown.

But isn't this situation a bit different than allowing soldiers who are 40 years old to enlist in the military?

43 posted on 09/23/2003 11:38:23 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
On the other hand, are you willing as a coach or owner to waste a high draft pick on a kid with his history?

He hasn't killed or raped anyone yet, so by NFL (and DNC) standards, he's a choir boy.

44 posted on 09/23/2003 11:38:36 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Aka legal drinking age.
45 posted on 09/23/2003 11:38:43 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rftc
should have a right to earn a living

That's crap. The only rights you have are in the Constitution. I don't recall an NFL amendment in it. Playing professional sports is a privlidge. Clarett screwed himself out of a career, and now wants the rules changes because he broke them? Nothing more than B.S. Period.

46 posted on 09/23/2003 11:38:45 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rftc
Dont blame OSU... Tressel tried to help this guy. Tressel was betrayed by Clarett and Claretts moms greed.
47 posted on 09/23/2003 11:39:14 AM PDT by smith288 ("The key to our success will be your execution." -Scott Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Agreed...Good luck to him, but even if he did get in to the draft, who would draft him? He hasn't even played a whole season(missed about half last year with an injury).

BTW, we are OSU fans and live about 20 miles from campus! This guy deserves the negativity about to follow. He(and his single(?) mother) have shown no remorse at all for his behavior(the fraudulant claims, the questionable funds, etc). I'm sick of thugs and various other two bit criminals who have athletic talent bringing up ridiculous claims like this or behaving in any manner they wish, usually supported by family members looking for their meal ticket and who have been grooming them for said meal ticket all their lives without concern for the character of the child they are grooming for "greatness".
48 posted on 09/23/2003 11:40:06 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I meant 'as a legal adult of 18 years of age' he should have the right to play in the NFL.

As long as he passes the physical and drug tests just like any other athlete..

49 posted on 09/23/2003 11:40:33 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jonalvy44
Spencer Haywood did NOT sue the NBA. That's an urban legend.

Spencer Haywood signed a contract with the ABA's Denver Rockets after completing two years of NCAA competition. It was the NCAA that sued Haywood, because their four-year rule prohibited a college athlete from turning pro until after they had four years in the NCAA. The courts took about eighteen months to rule that the four-year rule had no basis in law; in other words, the NCAA couldn't interfere with Haywood's right to sign a pro deal with the Rockets.

This situation is completely different from the Haywood case. Clarett has to find a basis in law to overturn the NFL's rules, not the NCAA's rules. That is much more difficult. Antitrust is the best chance, although the USFL case amounted to only $3.

The NBA eventually dropped its age requirement, since after the Haywood case and the later signing of Moses Malone by Utah of the ABA, they didn't want to lose all of the top talent. Legal action had nothing to do with it.
50 posted on 09/23/2003 11:41:01 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
I think they have to be 21, maybe 20. It has nothing to do with if they went to college, there are players that never play at the college level instead getting their seasoning in the semi-pros.

The NFL better win. Letting kids into the NBA has turned it from a juggernaut threatening to become the #2 or #1 sport to a joke with thugs for athletes and "good" players dropping freethrows less often than batters hit fastballs.
51 posted on 09/23/2003 11:41:04 AM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rftc
I meant 'as a legal adult of 18 years of age' he should have the right to play in the NFL.

They arent restricting based on age. Its based on 3 yrs removed from High School.

52 posted on 09/23/2003 11:41:25 AM PDT by smith288 ("The key to our success will be your execution." -Scott Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rftc
I'm sorry, but I don't think age guarantees the right to anything unless deemed so by the Constitution. He should have the *opportunity* to play. But a right? That's going too far in my opinion.
53 posted on 09/23/2003 11:41:58 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mhking
You cannot put limits on who you employ in this case. If someone is qualified to play then why can't he? The other organizations you cite are civil service or government positions.

Also, you mean to tell me that a team needing a running back or receiver would pass on the next Randy Moss, Terrell Owens or Clinton Portis if they could get them? Hell, leave them on the practice squad for a year and then turn them loose at the main team level. Screw the draft and screw your division rivals. If I am an NFL owner looking to win I would want underclassmen.
54 posted on 09/23/2003 11:42:06 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I agree, Clarett and his mom should pay the restitution if they file suit against OSU.
55 posted on 09/23/2003 11:42:22 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Didn't the NBA lose a similar case around 10-15 years ago?

The Spencer Haywood case (in 1970) was tied to the notion of sitting out affecting his future earnings. He won, and the floodgates were opened in the NBA.

In this case, Clarett is trying to use the same defense. The difference is that Clarett has been suspended a year by Ohio State for lying to NCAA investigators and for violating rules regarding compensation.

A judge would have to take that into consideration before rendering a verdict. (The judge in the case, ironically enough, is the son of legendary Ohio State coach Woody Hayes)

NFL Player's Union head Gene Upshaw said (in an ESPN article), "We support [the NFL's] position. ... I don't think he should be playing in the NFL yet. He should stay in school. This will be here for him.

"I'm concerned about [him] physically being prepared to play. I'd have loved to have played against a guy who's 18. I'd have whipped him."

He's impatient and greedy. And it's gonna cost him in the long run.

56 posted on 09/23/2003 11:42:47 AM PDT by mhking (Don't mess in the affairs of dragons; For you are crunchy, and taste great with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Maybe but he has already shown bad judgement and his advisors would make any GM shudder.....
57 posted on 09/23/2003 11:43:04 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: smith288
It's also part of the collective bargaining agreement signed with the NFL players association..that's why it'll stand..
58 posted on 09/23/2003 11:43:12 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Are businesses that only hire college graduates illegally discriminating? Or do high school graduates have a right to be hired by them?"


Since when does the NFL require a college degree for its players? I believe that less than half of its players graduated from college. The problem is that the NFL and NBA, unlike Major League Baseball, have their heads too far up their respective posteriors and refuse to set up a farm system to train young players. Major League Baseball teams signs hundreds of kids out of high school every year, and send them to the minor leagues, where they can develop and, if they make the grade, are eventually called up to the majors. Why can't the NBA and NFL do the same? Teams could draft whoever the hell they want, and if they aren't ready to play in the highest level they can keep them in a lower league. Nobody forces the teams to draft or sign young players---if a team refuses to draft players who are not at least 21 or who have not graduated from college, that's their prerogative. But it is wrong for this semi-governmental body (which has a monopoly on professional football in the U.S.) to tell a private corporation that it may not draft a player they want to draft simply because the league and the players' union want to keep salaries low.
59 posted on 09/23/2003 11:44:22 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I would say Clarett has to earn 'the priviledge' to play if he passes the drug screens etc. into the NFL
60 posted on 09/23/2003 11:45:16 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson