Skip to comments.
The Coming Of The Taxerminator (Arnold Explains His Free Market Views)
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 9/24/03
| Arnold Schwarzenegger
Posted on 09/23/2003 11:52:40 PM PDT by goldstategop
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:05:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
I have often said that the two people who have most profoundly impacted my thinking on economics are Milton Friedman and Adam Smith. At Christmas I sometimes annoy some of my more liberal Hollywood friends by sending them a gift of Mr. Friedman's classic economic primer, "Free to Choose." What I learned from Messrs. Friedman and Smith is a lesson that every political leader should never forget: that when the heavy fist of government becomes too overbearing and intrusive, it stifles the unlimited wealth creation process of a free people operating under a free enterprise system.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnoldplatform; conservatism; corruption; economy; freemarkets; freetochoose; governmentspending; liberalism; miltonfreeman; recallelection; schwarzenegger; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
"Free To Choose" economics. If you think Arnold still sounds like a liberal, think again. We need to restore the luster of the Golden State. And win one for The Gipper - with the Coming Of The Taxerminator on Oct. 7th!
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: goldstategop
Looks good to me. California conservatives must be humble. Must not boot their best chance to start digging out of the pit. If Arnold succeeds he creates a climate for more conservatives to elected, fewer Democrats. He also makes it easier for GWBush to win California is 2004.
4
posted on
09/24/2003 12:07:53 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: UnabashedConservative
The No Child Left Behind Act's requirements are opposed by teachers' unions. Arnold wants to expand public school choice and give local parents and teachers the freedom to manage their kids' education, not Sacramento bureaucrats. Hey Ted Kennedy wrote this bill and now liberals find it too hard to swallow? Let me tell ya, this law has been two years on the books and now the Left is saying its too harsh and there's not enough money. I agree with Arnold 100% we don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. Our schools will have to find a way to do more with existing revenue. Ditto for all the other government programs.
5
posted on
09/24/2003 12:10:59 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
I wonder how long it took Arnold's handlers to write this...
6
posted on
09/24/2003 12:14:24 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(Free Tommy Chong!)
To: goldstategop; Admin Moderator
You couldn't be bothered to use the real title of the article?
7
posted on
09/24/2003 12:15:00 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: goldstategop
If you think Arnold still sounds like a liberal, think again. Then how do you square that with this?
He can talk about Milton Freidman in broad terms until he's blue. It's what he proposes to DO that scares me.
9
posted on
09/24/2003 12:17:35 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: ambrose
You think he doesn't have his own mind? Arnold's a social libertarian. Live and let live on the personal stuff like Californians are and conservative on economics. It doesn't drive conservatives crazy for him but he's about the best that can be elected in a place like this. I mean on the stuff conservatives are concerned with, it seems to me I find it hard to disagree with anything he's written here. And if we insist on putting in someone we agree with 100% but who'll lose, California will keep on bleeding to death. Like Hugh Hewitt wrote elsewhere, if I have to make a choice, I'll take a Governor I agree with half the time to a Governor I agree with none of the time.
10
posted on
09/24/2003 12:19:07 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Carry_Okie
But the incredible Milton Friedman ENDORSES Arnold ... not McClintock. McClintock fails.
11
posted on
09/24/2003 12:19:29 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
To: Carry_Okie
I know about his enviro policy. I'll grant him some leeway as long as he leaves my wallet well enough alone. That's all that matters. I don't expect to agree with him 100% on everything.
12
posted on
09/24/2003 12:21:11 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Arnold is no social libertarian. He believes in racial classification by the State. Explain what libertarian principles are upheld by this practice.
Just amazing what you folks will swallow for the sake of "victory"...
13
posted on
09/24/2003 12:22:47 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(Free Tommy Chong!)
To: ambrose
I think he's wrong on Prop. 54. No it doesn't square with libertarian principles. Then again I have yet to meet a politician who is for something controversial and to be fair to Arnold, the Republicans opposed 209 when it was on the ballot here and they opposed the measure abolishing bilingual ed. The public is way ahead on this stuff and its more like the public leads and the politicians follow. So yeah he's a flawed choice in a fallen world but you think he's not where we want him to be, hey Large Breasts is your man.
14
posted on
09/24/2003 12:28:51 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
No, McClintock is my man. You folks can ride the Schwarzenegger bomb down like Slim Pickens at the end of Dr. Strangelove...
15
posted on
09/24/2003 12:31:06 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(Free Tommy Chong!)
To: goldstategop
I think you need to read all of it then. It's full of new spending, bond debt, unfunded mandates, and outrageous regulatory costs.
16
posted on
09/24/2003 12:31:59 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Carry_Okie
Really? And where exactly has he proposed new spending, bond debt, unfunded mandates, and outrageous regulatory costs? That sounds well - un Milton Friedman like.
18
posted on
09/24/2003 12:34:25 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
It's all detailed in the article. You have the link.
19
posted on
09/24/2003 12:36:11 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: ambrose
"I wonder how long it took Arnold's handlers to write this... "
My thoughts exactly! Sounds like he is lifting remarks from McClint's points and the critizism of Conservatives. A Conservative he will NEVER make ..... neither will his bevy of advisors.
Nam Vet
20
posted on
09/24/2003 12:36:12 AM PDT
by
Nam Vet
(It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson