Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers target 'insane' policy
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, September 25, 2003 | By Audrey Hudson

Posted on 09/24/2003 10:29:37 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:08:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Capitol Hill lawmakers are looking to overturn an "insane" decision by the Treasury Department, which allows banks to accept Mexican identification cards that federal law enforcement officials call a threat to national security.

The Treasury Department made its long-awaited decision on "matricula consular" cards last Thursday, just as the federal government was closing and lawmakers left town in anticipation of Hurricane Isabel.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: matricula; treasury
Thursday, September 25, 2003

Quote of the Day by Neets

1 posted on 09/24/2003 10:29:37 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; HiJinx
ping
2 posted on 09/25/2003 6:40:39 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; A CA Guy; ...
Bump-Ping!!!
The Border List TM

Freepmail me if you wish to be removed from or added to this list!

3 posted on 09/25/2003 7:32:13 AM PDT by HiJinx (News from the Wild Wild Washington...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge recently said banks should accept the cards "at their peril."

A spokesman for Homeland Security said this week they have not communicated their concerns to the Treasury Department.

Then what the hell good is Homeland Security, (other than being just another government oxymoron)?

4 posted on 09/25/2003 8:11:39 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Then what the hell good is Homeland Security

Just another expensive joke on America.

5 posted on 09/25/2003 8:19:46 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Just another expensive joke on America.

Thank you for clearing that up for me. LOL

6 posted on 09/25/2003 8:33:20 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Then what the hell good is Homeland Security, (other than being just another government oxymoron)?

Good question.

Anyone catch Condi Rice last night on the O'Reilly Factor? Bill questioned Rice about our Wide Open Borders. Below is the exchange:

O'REILLY: And this is national security. Polls say that 70 percent of Americans want the borders tightened up. The Bush administration hasn't done it.

Now you know (UNINTELLIGIBLE) put some more border patrol on there, but it's still a fairly open border for illegals and narcotics. Is there an explanation of why you guys wouldn't seal the border down?

RICE: Well, first of all, it's because we're an open country. And because we don't want to lose sight of who we are in what we do to protect ourselves. But I think if you talk to Tom Ridge, since the creation of the Homeland Security Department, and you talk to Tom Ridge about his relationships with his counterparts in Mexico and Canada, you would see tremendous progress on our perimeter.

O'REILLY: In what way? (UNINTELLIGIBLE) illegals in this country running around. We don't know who they are.

RICE: The focus on border control, the focus on in enhancing the borders, on technology borders -- you know President Bush was, of course, the governor of Texas. And he...

O'REILLY: And should know that he hasn't dealt with it successfully, with all due respect.

RICE: Bill, the fact of the matter is, as the president is fond of saying, family values don't stop at the Rio Grande.We've got to have a long-term plan also to make Mexico a more attractive place for Mexicans to work there.

O'REILLY: But if I'm an al Qaeda, I know I can get into Canada with phony I.D. I know I can sneak across the border, and I know I can get...

RICE: But it's a lot better than that. I mean, that's really not a reflection of the way that this is progressing. We have made tremendous progress with both Canada and Mexico on border control, on smart borders. Tom Ridge and his colleagues signed accords about a year and a half ago. They're using technology. We had excellent cooperation on the border between our...

O'REILLY: (UNINTELLIGIBLE) on the border. I agree with you on North Korea. I'm not sold on Iran. I think that they're going to do bad things. I'm certainly not sold on the border.

7 posted on 09/25/2003 11:26:32 AM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
I didn't see the interview with Rice (no cable TV) but after reading what you posted from the transcript I can sum it up as being not only "(UNINTELLIGIBLE)", but she also didn't much of anything.

"Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande." is irrelevant.

As for: "The focus on border control, the focus on in enhancing the borders, on technology borders -- you know President Bush was, of course, the governor of Texas." ... what in the world is she yammering about? Technology borders?

I give up. I just plain ol' give up on this government.

8 posted on 09/25/2003 12:29:57 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
As for: "The focus on border control, the focus on in enhancing the borders, on technology borders -- you know President Bush was, of course, the governor of Texas." ... what in the world is she yammering about? Technology borders?

I had the same reaction. On reading the transcript it is quite evident that Rice had great difficulty answering Bill's questions on our lack of border control in a coherent manner.

Rice was reduced to repeating the tired old slogans of her Boss that excuses away any defense of our country from this Epic Invasion from Mexico and groped around for silly euphemisms (like "technology borders"). Words that are no doubt conjured up by Bush's propaganda mill to soft-peddle leaving our borders wide open to the world.

I give up. I just plain ol' give up on this government.

This government has nothing to do with "We the People" anymore. Our government is owned by "We the People who will fund your campaign and bank accounts if you do as we say".

Indeed, there is little reason to be optimistic that this national nightmare will end anytime soon.

9 posted on 09/25/2003 1:05:01 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson