grayout wrote:
Does THIS read like people that just want to secure the military and have no hostility toward the law abiding Muslims of this country/ No other religion infects the mind and blinds the eyes like islam. and if that means denying military service to muslims than so be it and the rights of the adherants of this bastard death-cult In a more enlightened age, a high court ruled that islam was illegal in the U.S. How about shoe shiners The devil worshipers The above is not the language of rationality. This is not the language of 'lets just make sure our military is secure'. If these comments were made about Christians there would be meltdowns and frothing at the mouth about persecution. Creating a rational security plan for the military doesn't come from a place of 'all filthy devil worshiping Muslims must be segregated'.Notice if you will that nobody is saying "Death to all the heathens in the name of holy Christendom!"
Muslims — Muslims, not Jews or Hindus or animists, but MUSLIMS — killed almost 3,000 Americans on 9/11 and another 800 or so in the two decades prior to that to the general approval of the Muslim world.
They have not shown themselves to be worthy of the benefit of the doubt.
Muslims — Muslims, not Jews or Hindus or animists, but MUSLIMS — killed almost 3,000 Americans on 9/11They were also all male. Do we start casting a wary eye on all males now, too?
I'm not arguing that people who claimed to be Muslim carried out 9/11; that is obvious. What I'm arguing is that not all Muslims are radicals and terrorists, and therefore, not all Muslims should be looked upon such. That's all.