Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media new boogeyman of Iraq
UPI ^ | 9/27/2003 | Oamela Hess, Pentagon corresspondent

Posted on 09/27/2003 5:18:30 PM PDT by inPhase

WASHINGTON, Sept. 26 (UPI) -- As Bush administration officials and Pentagon chiefs peddle their $87 billion supplemental bill for Iraq next year - even as President Bush's popularity on the issue wanes -- they have a new enemy in their sites. Not Saddam or Osama, but the media.

As they see it, the problem in Iraq is not so much the almost daily casualties or the pace of rebuilding but the fact that the news media keeps harping on it, at the expense of reporting "good news."

"I understand that breaking news is largely driven by bad news. That's a structural defect of a free press," said L. Paul Bremer, the American administrator in Iraq, at a House Armed Services Committee Hearing Thursday.

The conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington is holding a symposium next week on the very topic. "Is the Bush administration losing control of the situation on the ground, or is the media transforming a military victory into a defeat?" asks a flyer for the Oct. 7 panel discussion. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell talked about the skewed news on Late Night with David Letterman on Thursday.

"It's a troublesome issue that we're all very concerned about," said Army Chief of Staff Gen. John Keane at the same hearing. "The American people need to have the (good) information to help balance the daily loss of life."

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aei; cpa; enemywithin; iraq; letterman; mediabias; mediacoverage; powell; ritinggud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: seamole
The frustration may come down to a difference in philosophy about the media's role in Iraq: Ought it be a dispassionate reflection of the every day reality of Iraq, which is, in my opinion, better than what news coverage suggests? Or ought it point out the problems that need fixing that the CPA and military are not aware of or acting on? Should it be a voice for the people trying to reconstruct Iraq, or the people in that country who have no voice?

The answer, of course, is both. The White House and Pentagon have bully pulpits and enormous budgets to tell their story.

Not true. The White House and the Pentagon may have pulpits, but the "bully" pulpit belongs to the TV anchor man. So yes, journalism should be a voice for the people in Iraq who have no voice--that is an apt description of the poor grunt trying to do his job and stay alive--while journalism gives Saddam's acolytes what they are killing for--positive ink as a credible threat to the US military.

That network anchorman works for a company which is in business through the good graces of the United States government--in the form of the FCC. It is in the national interest that the portion of the truth which government-licensed broadcasters tell be fairly representative of "what's going on in Iraq." "What's going on in Iraq" is not limited to bad news--and a government-licensed broadcast journalist should be required to make that clear as a condition of retaining their license.

Reporters, however, make their reputations on stories that effect change. When resources force them to pick, the latter will nearly always triumph. In my opinion, that's about the way it should be.
In my opinion, that's a good reason to read a book instead of the front page of a newspaper.

21 posted on 09/27/2003 6:20:42 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bud Bundy
Guess I was thinking that Bremer should have his own reporter team, embedded and invite whomever too. Let them debate it out, yes.

But I think they are doing that
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/
which you prob know and the sitemap has more interesting places.

One is a pictures and all news site, articles etc. A little dry though.
22 posted on 09/27/2003 6:23:49 PM PDT by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Bud Bundy
but nobody can find time to report the full story in Iraq.

Since that Georgia Dem wrote his good news article it has been better. The promo for Geraldo's show tonight said there will be a general on discussing good news tonight.

26 posted on 09/27/2003 6:29:04 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All
Some of the negative coverage is generated by an older generation of reporters who cut their teeth on the Vietnam war experience.

This SOB employee of UPI fails to mention the glowing praise the North Vietnamese Communist had for the American press. IMO the Communists' "most trusted man in America," Walter Cronkite was the biggest liar and cost the lives of thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of Vietnamese. Without his lies the Communists may have been willing to look for a way out in 1968. There is no question in my mind the American left wanted a U.S. defeat not just and end to the war.

Same today except they want us to be "rescued" by an international coalition of their leftist comrades.

And they should tell the truth at all times.

Uh.. the UPI employee is talking about the military. What about reporters?

Reporters, however, make their reputations on stories that effect change.

"Truth? I don't need no stinkin' truth -- I just want to make a difference. That's why I are a journalist."

27 posted on 09/27/2003 6:38:42 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: seamole
"It's a troublesome issue that we're all very concerned about," said Army Chief of Staff Gen. John Keane at the same hearing.

Uh, Ms UPI PENTAGON Reporter, General Keane is the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army--has been for years. General Pete Schoomaker took charge over a month ago from Shinseki.

What do you think would happen to a Dallas newspaper sports reporter who didn't know Bill Parcells was the head coach of the Dallas Cowboys a month into the season? Yet these idiot reporters on the military don't know even the most basic facts.

this is a hotly debated political issue -- that media outlets should not be expected to parrot for the Bush administration.

And notice how she frames the issue up front in her story--that its either the negative/incomplete reporting we get now or else being a "parrot for the Bush administration". Just remember when you read the news, even-handed reporting or good news = "parrot for Bush administration".

28 posted on 09/27/2003 7:01:38 PM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
I sincerely hope this was an "opinion" piece. If not, and is being reported as "news," this "reporter" should be fired ASAP.
29 posted on 09/27/2003 7:16:29 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
media outlets should not be expected to parrot for the Bush administration.

But it is O.K. for them to be a parrot for the leftist dims.

Actually, she was on Washington Journal on C-SPAN two Fridays ago, and she's not as bad as many. She was telling Brian about the many positive things she saw there, and how great the soliers were. Obviously the hardcore leftists didn't like that since they got vicious (asking her if the words 'ugly' and 'whore' meant anything to her!).

30 posted on 09/27/2003 7:26:23 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
"The media lies non stop and then criticizes anyone who dares to complain."

They do? ;-}
31 posted on 09/27/2003 7:28:58 PM PDT by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PLK
I sincerely hope this was an "opinion" piece. If not, and is being reported as "news," this "reporter" should be fired ASAP.

I don't know how UPI classified it, but I take it as opinion. It is sort of a 'travelogue' of her time in Iraq and reflection on the current controversy over coverage. My Post#30 mentions her appearance on C-SPAN, this is almost a recap of that. I just happened across another piece by her that is a pretty straight-forward news story.

Bremer: Kuwait, Saudi claim on Iraq unfair; should give up their reparation claims for 1990 invasion

32 posted on 09/27/2003 8:34:33 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The media are the enemy because they are the enemy--because they are full of left-wing liars who deliberately twist the news.

As we all know. Thank God for FOX News and conservative talk radio.

These liberal liars no longer go unchallenged.

33 posted on 09/27/2003 10:17:43 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson