To: OriginalV
ON THE ONE hand, Goode and the childs father dont want their daughter robbed of her ethnicity, she said. On the other, she believes a distinctively black name could end up being an economic impediment. So this is the way MSNBC covers up for yet another illegitimate child from an unwed mother? This is her third out of wedlock kid. This kid already is earmarked for failure because of the terrible odds created by its mother, no matter what the hell her name is.
4 posted on
09/28/2003 7:16:31 PM PDT by
KC_Conspirator
(This space for rent)
To: KC_Conspirator
3rd child?
How does she call her kids?
By their last names?
14 posted on
09/28/2003 7:25:27 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
(It is perfectly fine to kill people when you are defending yourself)
To: KC_Conspirator
"So this is the way MSNBC covers up for yet another illegitimate child from an unwed mother? This is her third out of wedlock kid. This kid already is
earmarked for failure because of the terrible odds created by its mother, no matter what the hell her name is."
I just skimmed the article, so I missed this part. Leave it to a bunch of losers like MSNBC to overlook the most important part of the economic picture. Of course, looking at the reality of the situation might mean that someone (the unwed mother, for example) might have to take some responsibility here. But this way, it looks like this person is just a victim of white America.
To: KC_Conspirator
ditto... why would they say 'child's father' if they're married? Illegitimacy and all that comes with it is far worse than being named whatever a 'black name' is.
22 posted on
09/28/2003 7:39:31 PM PDT by
cyborg
(dankie jou)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson