Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question for all who are voting for,or supporting Arnold?

Posted on 09/29/2003 10:19:19 AM PDT by Delphinium

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: A CA Guy
I believe McClintock is pro-life.
41 posted on 09/29/2003 10:40:57 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
1. Schwarzenegger said no new taxes over his dead body.
2. Schwarzenegger is not a politico.
3. Schwarzenegger will reform workers comp and other buisness killing taxess and regulations.
4. Schwarzenegger is against the car tax.
5. Schwarzenegger is against the driver licenses for illegals.
5. Schwarzenegger is for parental Consent.
6. Schwarzenegger is against partial birth abortion.
7. Schwarzenegger projects a strong image as a leader. McClintock who although has nice ideas, makes Davis and Bustamante look charismatic.
8. Schwarzenegger is for local school control.
9. I believe Schwarzenegger has a better chance of effecting positive change and reform in California than McClintock or any of the other candidates.
42 posted on 09/29/2003 10:41:47 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapy
Why would that piss off liberals?

You mean like the Kennedys?
43 posted on 09/29/2003 10:42:16 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Have I missed something?

Well, you've certainly missed something from this thread. The word is PRINCIPLE.

A PRINCIPAL works for a school. Remember......he's a "prince of a pal?"

44 posted on 09/29/2003 10:43:13 AM PDT by EggsAckley (..........................I report...THEY decide.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
So yes, you began this thread to slam freepers who choose to vote for Schwarzenegger.
45 posted on 09/29/2003 10:43:23 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Okay,that is a real answer.
46 posted on 09/29/2003 10:43:33 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
The principal that a sentence should not end with a preposition, particularly one used previously in the same sentence.
47 posted on 09/29/2003 10:43:41 AM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Beautiful!!!... I'll be right back!
48 posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:04 AM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Which policies?
49 posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:18 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
principal=principle
50 posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:29 AM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

51 posted on 09/29/2003 10:46:13 AM PDT by CheneyChick (www.JoinArnold.com - "Let's Bring Kah-lee-fohr-nya Back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Just curious,for what principals are you voting for?

Principal Seymour Skinner, of course!


52 posted on 09/29/2003 10:46:49 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
I'm not voting, I left California over a decade ago.

But the principle I would vote for is leadership. The same quality I saw and still see in President Bush. In Ronald Reagan. It includes optimism, the ability to work with both sides, a vision.

Anyone can be a "policy wonk", list stats and information. And claim to stand by "principles", meantime using tactics that defy true ethical principles. Think of Al Gore.

Leadership is what California needs. Social issues are secondary for the sinking ship of the economy there. And true leadership is not easy to find, it is a true gift. Arnold has it, you can feel the power of his dreams and vision for California every time he talks. When McClintock talks he seems to alienate. That will accomplish nothing.

Of course you will put this down as too simplistic, as RINO, as a sell-out. That's fine. But you would settle for Bustamante to satisfy your principles. I see some real contradictions in that approach, and you should too.
53 posted on 09/29/2003 10:47:26 AM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
No.

It's the same old question McClintock supporters presented to the Schwarzenegger supporters when he signed on, at whimsy, for the governorship: "Why are we supposed to vote for Arnold?"

We have one Freeper able to answer the question.

The answer suffers from conflicting responses and a lack of proponents within Schwarzenegger's team, but the fact remains, there's precious few who can give a good reason to vote for Arnold.
54 posted on 09/29/2003 10:48:39 AM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
I guess my lack of education is showing?
55 posted on 09/29/2003 10:50:08 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
"Just win, baby!"

That's my take on it, anyway.

56 posted on 09/29/2003 10:50:11 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Anyone can be a "policy wonk"

Ann is harshing the Tom dude's buzz.

57 posted on 09/29/2003 10:50:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom; Delphinium
Freepers have posted, ad nauseum, why they are supporting Schwarzenegger for Governor. It is the McClintock supporters who refuse to 'listen', reason and accpt the continued explanations. This thread was begun ONLY to bash Schwarzenegger supporters. Period. Why waste energy explaining and re-explaining what has ALREADY been explained before. sheesh.
58 posted on 09/29/2003 10:52:37 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
accpt = accept
59 posted on 09/29/2003 10:53:23 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
Correct Mrs. Tiggywinkle. I've been on a few threads with the McClintock people here in the past and none of them will accept anything as a reason to support Arnold. That is why I have not responded to this obvious attempt to flame Arnold supporters. But since it's you...what the heck!

How are ya?????
60 posted on 09/29/2003 10:54:33 AM PDT by SONbrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson