Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key Srebrenica Witness Admits Lying
IWPR ^ | 2003-09-29 | Chris Stephen

Posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:57 PM PDT by DTA

Key Srebrenica Witness Admits Lying

Momir Nikolic's fictional account of massacre raises questions about plea-bargain system.

By Chris Stephen in The Hague (TU 327, 29 September 2003)

The Hague prosecution's star witness in the Srebrenica case has admitted in court that he lied in testimony when he said he ordered one of the biggest single massacres of Bosnian Muslims.

Former Bosnian Serb army captain Momir Nikolic's admission in a courtroom appearance this week will undermine confidence in other details he has supplied about the Srebrenica killings in July 1995, and raises questions about how plea-bargain agreements are negotiated with those accused of war crimes.

Nikolic, an army intelligence officer who was present during the massacres and was indicted by The Hague for playing a major role in them, made history as the first Serb officer to give evidence against his colleagues.

But now doubts about his reliability as a witness have arisen after he admitted that a statement he gave to prosecutors earlier this year contained a lie.

In a courtroom appearance on September 29, he admitted he did not give the orders to gun down more than 1,000 Bosnian Muslims inside a warehouse at Kravica. He was not even present when it happened, on July 13, 1995. Kravica was one of the single biggest massacres carried out by Serb forces around Srebrenica.

In recent days, Nikolic has been in court as part of a plea-bargain deal with prosecutors, giving evidence against Vidoje Blagojevic and Dragan Jokic, Bosnian Serb officers indicted for war crimes alongside him. In May, prosecutors agreed to drop a genocide charge against him and seek a lesser sentence of 15 to 20 years, and in return he changed his not guilty plea to an admission that he committed crimes against humanity.

But now, Nikolic has renounced his original statement that he had personally supervised the Kravica killings.

"You needed to give him [the prosecutor] something he did not have, right?" said Michael Karnavas, defending. "You wanted to limit your time of imprisonment to 20 years, that was part of the arrangement, yes? Quid pro quo?"

Nikolic admitted he had lied, "I did not tell the truth when I said that. Afterwards I said I had made a mistake, I had lied.

"I apologise. All I can do is confess and say that discussing the crime is a very difficult situation to be in."

"I think we should call it for what it is, a bald faced lie," said Karnavas.

"I'm still a little bit confused," the American lawyer continued. "How is it that you thought by admitting to one of the most horrendous executions in this area, that this would help you in getting the kind of sentence that you are hoping and praying for?"

"I wanted the agreement to succeed," responded Nikolic.

His original statement to prosecutors included testimony that while at Kravica, he had observed the involvement of another war crimes suspect, former army officer Ljubomir Borovcanin, in the killing.

He has now told the court that although he was not present, he was certain that Borovcanin had been there.

"You implicated Borovcanin in your falsehood in order to make your story more convincing, so that the prosecutor would buy it?" said Karnavas. "You needed to give him [the prosecutor] some more facts to sweeten the deal - that's why you provided false information about Kravica?"

He went on to ask Nikolic whether he had lied so as to make his story impressive enough for prosecutors to offer him a plea-bargain deal. "Your lawyers had a laundry list of factors that the prosecutor was expected to agree to," said Karnavas.

"The prosecution did not exert any influence on me," responded Nikolic. "What I did is my own mistake."

Karnavas continued to press him, saying, "Did you think that by falsely admitting to having ordered this execution that you were solving a question-mark in the prosecutor's case as to who had ordered that murder?"

Nikolic's admission could have serious implications for the prosecution strategy of using plea bargains.

In recent weeks, prosecutors have persuaded several former Bosnian Serb commanders to give evidence against their former comrades by offering to cut their sentences.

Nikolic's plea-bargain negotiations took six months, starting last November. It now seems he was so desperate to get a deal with prosecutors that he was willing to lie to them.

The prosecutors are in a difficult position. They will only offer plea-bargain arrangements to people who can give high-quality evidence. But this case suggests that some defendants could be tempted to embroider the facts to make their crimes more "worthy" of a deal.

Chris Stephen is IWPR's tribunal project manager.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: albright; balkans; bosnia; campaignfinance; clinton; codewordforsilence; icg; icty; soros; srebrenica; un; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last
It's not news for Freepers but can be for Liberal lurkers.
1 posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:58 PM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *balkans; Destro; dennisw; knighthawk; Incorrigible; LA-Lawyer; stella; Asher; joan
A Major blow for liberal supporters of Islamic terrorists.

Self Destruction of Srebrenica Hoax has started. Kangaroo Court can not prove liberal fabrications and has to groom false witnesses.

Just like Stalin and Hitler.

They will end the same way, in the dumpster of history.

2 posted on 09/29/2003 10:55:37 PM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA
Sorry, I don't understand..

Are you saying the Serbs didn't commit the murders/massacre?
That the massacre never happened? No mass graves were found?

Seems to me, this still boils down to individual responsibility.
The only question is, who gave the orders.

3 posted on 09/29/2003 11:27:28 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DTA
The Dutch television network VPRO aired a very nice piece on the Milosevics trial. It shows how the prosecutions case is falling apart and how witnessess (often war criminals) are bribed to implicate Milosevic. Be sure to check it out at:

http://info.vpro.nl/info/tegenlicht/index.shtml?7738514+7738518+7738520+14130404

You can watch the program in streaming video. There are two one hour parts. It is in Dutch but large parts are in English, Serbian and German.
4 posted on 09/30/2003 2:20:46 AM PDT by konijn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor13; getgoing; alternatediscourse
bttt
5 posted on 09/30/2003 4:17:40 AM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt; ninenot; u-89; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; ...
But this case suggests that some defendants could be tempted to embroider the facts to make their crimes more "worthy" of a deal.

No kidding. What is good for Americans is good for Serbs.

6 posted on 09/30/2003 5:05:55 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Serbs versus Muslims with Jihadist support from Saudi Arabia? I think I'll go with the Christian side.
7 posted on 09/30/2003 5:20:32 AM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I think I'll go with the Christian side.

Let me know when you find it.

8 posted on 09/30/2003 5:23:56 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I will always go with the Christian side.
9 posted on 09/30/2003 5:24:35 AM PDT by BayouCoyote (PORK AKBAR!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I think I'll go with the Christian side.

Let me know when you find it.

Obviously the Balkan Muslims and their Jihadist funders (Saudi Arabia) and shock troops knew what it was. But poor Poohbah doesn't. Or at least pretends he doesn't. It's about Islamic lebensraum and irredentism. More turf to be claimed for the realm of Dar-al-Islam.

10 posted on 09/30/2003 5:30:58 AM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I think I'll go with the Christian side.

Let me know when you find it.

Does it look to you like a mosque?:

See the oldest buildings of Kosovo (Before KLA freedom fighters erase them)

11 posted on 09/30/2003 5:34:03 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Obviously the Balkan Muslims and their Jihadist funders (Saudi Arabia) and shock troops knew what it was. But poor Poohbah doesn't.

I'm saying that the Serb "Christians" are about as "Christian" as ol' Adolph's boys were. "By their fruits ye shall know them" and all that.

Only on Free Republic can a communist thug be turned into a conservative icon.

12 posted on 09/30/2003 5:34:11 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Just because someone claims to be defending a church building doesn't mean that he's actually a Christian.

And Srebenica was, by any definition except that of the Serbs, a war crime.

I question the conservative credentials of anyone who sticks up for a bunch of not-so-ex-commie thugs.
13 posted on 09/30/2003 5:36:57 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Islamic lebensraum

Good phrase!

14 posted on 09/30/2003 5:41:29 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Just because someone claims to be defending a church building doesn't mean that he's actually a Christian.

No, but defending the destruction of churches IS anti-Christian.

And Srebenica was, by any definition except that of the Serbs, a war crime.

Read more about Srebrenica fabrication:

http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/falsely.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/3757/serbia/articles/srebrenica_hoax_b.html
http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/politics/media_watch/html/dorich.html

See also here on F.R.:
Key Srebrenica Witness Admits Lying

15 posted on 09/30/2003 5:44:33 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Srbrenica denier logic:

I didn't kick your dog. Nobody saw me do it. Besides, it bit me first.

16 posted on 09/30/2003 7:42:49 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
>>>>Sorry, I don't understand.. Are you saying the Serbs didn't commit the murders/massacre? That the massacre never happened? No mass graves were found? <<<<<<

War is hell. All deaths in war are regretabble, of civilians and soldiers alike. That is why The Nuremberg Trial has convicted Nazis for CRIME AGAINST PEACE as their ultimate crime. The fact rarely if ever mention by multi-culti supporters of Jihhadists is that Bosnian Muslims extremists have started Bosnian Civil War with the ritual killing on a Christian wedding, held at Orthodox Christmas, January 1992.

Killing an enemy soldier in battle is not murder neither it is massacre nor it is a war crime. War crime is an activity that violates Geneva Convention and The Hague Conventions of Laws and Customs of War on Land

In civil wars those rules are hard to enforce.

An example. A column consisting of armed and non-armed soldiers and male civilians attempts to break out from encirclement refusing to surrender. Armed ones prevent non-armed from surrendering. Gun Battle continues and most of the retreating men are killed. How would you described it? War casualty? Manslaughter? Killing ? Murder? Homicide? War Crime? Gendocide?

I have deliberately left out the ethnicity/religious affiliation.

I do not deny the fact that some Serbs have commited war crimes during Bosnian Civil War. ALL individuals guilty of war crimes ON ALL THREE SIDES (Bosnian Muslims, Croats, Serbs) should be punished. This will not bring victims back to life but may prevent similar crimes in the future. Administering one sidedness instread of justice will only make bad things worse and prevent reconcilliation.

The real issue with ICTY is something else -distorted view to depict events in Srebrenica as Genocide, which it was not and accuse Serbs as a people for being genocidal nation. This is an act of the ultimate Holocaust revisionism aimed at whitewashing Genocide in Bosnia in WWII when more than half amillion Serbs, Jews and Gypsies were savagely exterminated by Croatian and Bosnian Muslim Nazis.(events described by liberals as "irrelevant" and 'ancient history' although some perpetrators are still alive).

Srebrenica was not a genocide. To use the parlance of liberal media and liberal supporters of Islamists, it was "understandable revenge".

17 posted on 09/30/2003 7:44:02 AM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DTA
You were sounding great at this point:

I do not deny the fact that some Serbs have commited war crimes during Bosnian Civil War. ALL individuals guilty of war crimes ON ALL THREE SIDES (Bosnian Muslims, Croats, Serbs) should be punished.

But then you reverted to form.

Srebrenica was not a genocide. To use the parlance of liberal media and liberal supporters of Islamists, it was "understandable revenge".

18 posted on 09/30/2003 8:00:47 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Sorry, I don't understand.. Are you saying the Serbs didn't commit the murders/massacre? That the massacre never happened? No mass graves were found?

I don't understand either. Who put the bullet holes in that warehouse in Kravica? I saw them every day for the six months I was stationed there Even the locals in Kravica and Glogova called it the "killbox."

19 posted on 09/30/2003 8:12:22 AM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
>>>>>"killbox."<<<<

Kravica is Serb village and I believe that their native language is Serbian, not English.

What is the exact term Serb villagers used that you translated as "killbox" ?

20 posted on 09/30/2003 8:20:22 AM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
During the war, the world's major media (esp. US) pounded the Serb ethnic cleansing of Muslims. They said nothing about the Muslim troops pouring over the borders to ethnically cleanse the Serb Christians. This was done in large numbers, but it was just not PC to talk about this side of things. The ethnic cleansing of Serb Christians as well as Serb ethnic cleansing of muslims was well documented by two well known human rights orgns. Sorry I can't give names--something like Human Rights Int. These statistics were given in very few media, but hey were there, and I am sure the archives of various orgn can be accessed to give them.

This was, of course, pre 9-11, so the greatest sympathy was with the Muslims over the Christian side. And let's dispense with the sarcasm about the Christian side not acting like Christians. I concede Christians often do not toe the line set out in the Bible. However, that does not zero out what the other side did. It was tit for tat, but was reported one-sidedly.

vaudine
21 posted on 09/30/2003 8:35:23 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
Actually, as far as I'm concerned...they're all equally worthless.

Bottom line: a bunch of folks decided to sow the wind, then whined about how they didn't want to reap the whirlwind.
22 posted on 09/30/2003 8:38:39 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
Ask about Glamach, SW Bosnia...no serb left, ask about Tusla, most serb gone and no fighting there. Ask about enclave of Muslim live south of Brcko and allied to Serb through whole war against Izabegovich...ask why Izabegovich spends 16 years in Yugo prison and his connection to Young Muslims movement...many questions, accusers of Serb not like answers. Ask why Islamics try blow up Pope in 1997 in Bosnia.
23 posted on 09/30/2003 9:27:35 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
read later bump
24 posted on 09/30/2003 9:28:42 AM PDT by nutmeg ("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA
Did somebody forget to ping Hoplite?
25 posted on 09/30/2003 9:36:10 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
That would be me! Oops!
26 posted on 09/30/2003 9:36:35 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; livius; Fusion; Jomini
It's about Islamic lebensraum and irredentism

I had to look up both lebensraum and irredentism.  Wow!

Those words are Fusion worthy!!!

27 posted on 09/30/2003 9:41:47 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DTA; Tragically Single
Yea, what is the Serbo-Croatian term for "killbox"- Where did your assigned translator come from?
28 posted on 09/30/2003 10:52:22 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DTA; Drammach; konijn; joan; A. Pole; dennisw; Poohbah; BayouCoyote; livius; mark502inf; ...
The "massacre" of Muslims in Srebrenica was and is a hoax

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Srebrenica+hoax

29 posted on 09/30/2003 11:02:59 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yokozuna; Gael
Have you read this yet?
30 posted on 09/30/2003 11:50:57 AM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA; Destro
Kravica is Serb village and I believe that their native language is Serbian, not English.

Thanks for the blinding flash of the obvious. I assumed everyone on this thread would realize that not many Bosnians, be they Serb,Muslim, or Croat, speak English as a first language, and would therefore understand that the term I used was a translation. Sorry if the quotation marks caused any confusion.

I had a pool of about 12 interpreters (the numbers fluctuated due to personnel changes, etc). They were fairly evenly split between Muslims and Serbs, although I did have one Croat.

I don't speak Serbo-Croatian, and never claimed to, but that particular term came up many times in conversations with locals in the Kravica/Glogova area.

The main question is still unaddressed: Who shot up the warehouse in Kravica?

31 posted on 09/30/2003 12:34:38 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
Well, what did it sound like to you when they said it? Do you remember the names of the translators who said "killbox" to you?

Also, is there a pic on the web of the warehouse on the web anywhere?

What if it was a place, during the war, that ambushers used? What were the dimensions - length, width, and height? Naser Oric and his soldiers raided Kravica several times didn't they? What if they kidnapped Serb villagers and killed them and their livestock there?

32 posted on 09/30/2003 12:42:55 PM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DTA
I agree with some of what you say.
Specifically, that it was a civil war, and all sides bear some blame.

However, your link title concerning the wedding states January, when the actual date, according to links I read, was in March.
Mis-stating the date weakens your argument.
It doesn't completely discount it, but it weakens it.

Additionally, your contention that Srebrenica was not genocide due to the excuse of "understandable revenge" completely destroys any previous arguments you may have made.
You completely lost any respect for your arguments with your last 2 paragraphs.

I direct you (and others) to the Srebinica timeline of events.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/675945.stm

I understood that the balkans would become a bloodbath as soon as the first declarations of sovereignty were made.
Serbians must accept their part in those atrocities, and stop making excuses.
33 posted on 09/30/2003 12:57:50 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Serbians must accept their part in those atrocities, and stop making excuses.

Even if those atrocities are not true?

34 posted on 09/30/2003 12:58:59 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Serbians must accept their part in those atrocities, and stop making excuses.

Most of what I read indicates that Serbian atrocities are mainly fiction.

35 posted on 09/30/2003 1:06:30 PM PDT by martianagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Even if those atrocities are not true?

Then I guess you are saying the accusations against the Croatians and Bosnians are "untrue" as well?
That the whole thing was just a figment of our imaginations?

36 posted on 09/30/2003 1:09:04 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: martianagent
Most of what I read indicates that Serbian atrocities are mainly fiction.

Ultimately, you are responsible for vetting your sources of information.

I suggest you do so a little more rigorously.

37 posted on 09/30/2003 1:15:18 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
But the Canadian soldiers, fully named men, saw Croats murder Serbs with their own eyes. They also took pictures and witnessed the aftermath very soon after certain Croat operations. One report said two Croatian Serb teenagers' bodies were still hot enough to melt plastic after the Croat had killed them and set them on fire. The Canadian soldiers want to testify; want to bring their photos to court. They aren't anonymous - they were there GENUINE WITNESSES!
38 posted on 09/30/2003 1:16:22 PM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Then I guess you are saying the accusations against the Croatians and Bosnians are "untrue" as well?

Are you saying that the accusations must be all true or all false? Why?

39 posted on 09/30/2003 1:17:28 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: martianagent
Most of what I read indicates that Serbian atrocities are mainly fiction.

Then you need to do a little more reading.
As stated before, the other parties must bear their part in the blame, but so must Serbia.
I am sure there are exaggerated claims on all sides, but that does not mean any of them are blameless.

Just out of curiousity, how old were you in 1991?
How well do you remember the actual events?
No insult intended, just wondering if you experienced that part of world history as an adult, or if you were still a child, adolescent, teenager, etc..

( I was 44 years old, and kept very close track of every thing that happened during that time. )

40 posted on 09/30/2003 1:21:52 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: martianagent
Most of what I read indicates that Serbian atrocities are mainly fiction.

Well, that settles it . . . no more Balkan threads. Hooray!

41 posted on 09/30/2003 1:24:13 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Are you saying that the accusations must be all true or all false? Why?

No, I am saying that each accusation must be judged on an individual basis, and the truth or falsity of that accusation be verified.

You seem to be claiming the virginal innocence of the Serbs, and at the same time, the satanic guilt of the Croats and Bosnians.

I am not a fool, do not further convince me that you are one.

42 posted on 09/30/2003 1:27:12 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
No, I am saying that each accusation must be judged on an individual basis, and the truth or falsity of that accusation be verified.

You seem to be very confused, Sir. It was you who tried to combine different accusations. Let me refresh your memory:

[me:] Even if those atrocities are not true?

[you:] Then I guess you are saying the accusations against the Croatians and Bosnians are "untrue" as well?

Do you see now?

You seem to be claiming the virginal innocence of the Serbs, and at the same time, the satanic guilt of the Croats and [Muslim] Bosnians.

Does it really seem it to you so? There is a long way from not being a genocidal murderer to the "virginal innocence", and there is a long way (although shorter) from being a guilty party to the "satanic guilt".

43 posted on 09/30/2003 1:35:57 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
No, YOU seem to be doing your best to start and maintain an argument for it's own sake.

Let Me Remind You...
Serbians must accept their part in those atrocities, and stop making excuses.
Your response...
"Even if those atrocities are not true?"
You claim the Serbian atrocities are falsely claimed, which I reject, not wholely, but on an individual basis.
In the case of Srebrinica, my personal verdict is the Serbs are Guilty.

I then suggest that if accusations against the Serbs are false, then the accusations against the Croatians and Bosnians may be false as well.
You reject this argument, the Croatians and Bosnians are guilty, thusly...
Are you saying that the accusations must be all true or all false? Why?

I reiterate... "Serbs must must accept Their Part in those atrocities and stop making excuses."

Your wholesale denial of Serbian guilt implies, by default, the complete guilt of either the Croats or the Bosnians, or Both. ( Unless you can somehow rationalize the Americans as the guilty party )

44 posted on 09/30/2003 2:49:13 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Your wholesale denial of Serbian guilt implies, by default, the complete guilt of either the Croats or the Bosnians, or Both. ( Unless you can somehow rationalize the Americans as the guilty party )

Whoa! What are you talking about? I have pointed to the fact that genocide in Srebrenica was a fabrication same way as imagined rape/death camps were. And you counter this by accusing me of demonizing Croats and Bosnian Muslims or of claiming that Serbs are perfect angelic beings.

What type of logic it is? If someone accuses you of murdering your neighbour and you deny it, does it mean that you must be either guilty or a saint?

45 posted on 09/30/2003 3:05:36 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: joan
Well, what did it sound like to you when they said it?

No, I don't remember. It was two years ago and like I said, I don't speak Serbo-Croatian.

Do you remember the names of the translators who said "killbox" to you?

Yes, I'm in fairly close contact with them, and no, I won't give you their names.

Also, is there a pic on the web of the warehouse on the web anywhere?

I've got pictures of the Kravica warehouse that I took on my hard drive, so if someone can help me to post them, I'd be glad to share.

46 posted on 09/30/2003 3:36:56 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Sebrenica is not a fabrication..

You are in denial..

Grow Up...

47 posted on 09/30/2003 4:15:14 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single

There is a chapter in the NIOD report on what happened at Kravica warehouse, to include links between the warhouse and mass graves.

Joan has seen it all before, however, and remains impervious to anything other than crimes committed against Serbs, and will play stupid whether deniability is maintainable or not.

48 posted on 09/30/2003 4:17:15 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite; Tragically Single; joan; A. Pole
So Bosnian Muslims stand 12 feet high? Some high up and large pit marks, eh? Not caused by AK47s now is it? Imagine, bullet holes on buildings in a warzone.

I hope no one accuses the US Airforce of genocide when it uses the term "killbox".

49 posted on 09/30/2003 9:17:28 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All

the mark of the beast - the same beast that created the Srebnica hoax
50 posted on 09/30/2003 9:34:47 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson