Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthandlife
Thanks to Andrew Sullivan for writing on this subject. The conclusion is clear. Ronald Reagan was a "good man." Being genuine and honest at his core, most of what he did as a public man, turned out well.

That is the central nature of the four Presidents who appear on Mount Rushmore. That is the central nature of all the Presidents other than those, who would merit inclusion if the monument were to expand.

George Bush is also a "good man." None of the Democrats now trying to take is place are "good men," nor can one "good man" be cobbled together from the lot of them, piece by piece. And yet, being a "good man" cannot be the basis of any campaign for office; it is an historical judgment that can only be made in the fullness of time -- as Sullivan has just done concerning Reagan.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Democrats Dancing to Tunes of Glory?," discussion thread on FR. Article also on ChronWatch.

3 posted on 09/30/2003 5:44:28 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Agreed. In order to be a "good man", you must have a core honesty and decency. None of the Democrat Wannabes have this. They are all phoney, superficial suits with nothing underneath.
9 posted on 09/30/2003 5:59:26 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson