To: alnick
Oh, and the word "possible" obviously qualifies the phrase "unauthorized disclosures" - not the phrase "undercover CIA employee"...
7 posted on
10/01/2003 4:16:16 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: AntiGuv
But I believe the statute also indicates that the person leaking must know that the leak could result in physical harm to the person whose identity is being disclosed. If this chick wasn't undercover, how could her ID being disclosed do her any harm?
12 posted on
10/01/2003 4:22:26 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: AntiGuv
Here's what the Gonzales memo did: Restated the charges.
I repeat: Plame may or may not have been covert. Jumping to conclusions is not smart.
14 posted on
10/01/2003 4:26:28 AM PDT by
alnick
(The truth shall set you free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson