Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alnick
Oh, and the word "possible" obviously qualifies the phrase "unauthorized disclosures" - not the phrase "undercover CIA employee"...
7 posted on 10/01/2003 4:16:16 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
But I believe the statute also indicates that the person leaking must know that the leak could result in physical harm to the person whose identity is being disclosed. If this chick wasn't undercover, how could her ID being disclosed do her any harm?
12 posted on 10/01/2003 4:22:26 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Here's what the Gonzales memo did: Restated the charges.

I repeat: Plame may or may not have been covert. Jumping to conclusions is not smart.
14 posted on 10/01/2003 4:26:28 AM PDT by alnick (The truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson