Now, now -- Surely you cannot deny that the goal is to move people to NH and elect libertarians to do libertarian things -- invasion and taking over, in Mr. whatsisface's unfortunate words.
As Dr.Frank pointed out, a majority can't be achieved with 20,000 folks, even in a small state like NH.
Don't shoot the messenger -- it's not my fault that libertarians haven't got the political sense God gave a dung beetle.
It is an admission, if you will, that an organization which polls at or around the margin of error, is not going to make any impact nationally in the foreseeable future. Therefore, instead of having a small number of people dispersed nationally and having little impact on a large area (the country as a whole), why not concentrate them all in one place and have a big impact on a small area.
Nutty, naive and bound to failure, but there is a certain logic and realism there.
Probably correct. Which makes the lofty claims for the FSP somewhat speculative -- even silly.
Nope, it makes your hyped up claims about the FSP lying speculation -- and more than silly.
Now, now -- Surely you cannot deny that the goal is to move people to NH and elect libertarians to do libertarian things --
Yep, I deny your lying hype.
The goal is to restore constitutional government in NH..
invasion and taking over, in Mr. whatsisface's unfortunate words. As Dr.Frank pointed out, a majority can't be achieved with 20,000 folks, even in a small state like NH.
To which you replied, "probably correct".. - Honestly, r9-bippy, do you ever pay attention to anything before opening your mouth and removing all doubt? I think I can count on one finger the number of useful posts I've ever seen you make (and that one must have been an accident.
Don't shoot the messenger -- it's not my fault that libertarians haven't got the political sense God gave a dung beetle.
Your 'message' was shot long ago boyo, out of your own lying mouth..