Ahhhh -- so finally you ask the question you meant to ask, and not the one I was answering. OK, then. In the future, maybe you can ask the proper question the first time?
Can you reference that the "LP" is organizing this project? Or do you just make up what ever you want about the LP and state it as a fact?
Actually, I'm just assuming that, based on the fact that it's always billed (see FR posts on it) as a "libertarian initiative," and the fact the Libertarian Party spokesmen are generally quoted in the articles.
In this article, for example, the chairman of the New Hampshire Libertarian Party refers to the FSP as something "we" are doing, and the LP seems to endorse the idea.
I'm no doubt glossing over the subtleties of who's actually sponsoring it, though the LP is clearly a major player (two of FSP's leadership team are LP members). It's a matter of some indifference to me, however, whether we're talking about 'L' or 'l' ibertarians.
Pretty much the only point I'm making on this thread is that the head of the NH LP was not telling the truth about "invade and take over."
Actually I asked it quite accurately the first time, and clarified it the second time. The third time I had to explain it like I was talking to a child. You only need to read what is written, without jumping to conclusions.
I see however, by your answer, that jumping to conclusions, and adding your own fantasy to what is plainly in front of you, is not an occasional occurrence, but a regular occurrence.
Not only were you not able to get my simple question correctly, but you admit that you were "assuming" from "FR posts" and "articles" that which neither have been saying. Your not being able to accurately understand my original question, is exactly the same as your not being able to understand the "FR posts" and "articles." I guess you are "assuming" to much.
It's a matter of some indifference to me, however, whether we're talking about 'L' or 'l' ibertarians.
Now that is a lame excuse for your jumping to conclusions, and getting the facts wrong. Libertarian Party members are not the same thing as the "LP." An "LP" officer, is not the same thing as the "LP."
Ahhhh - I guess a bit of innaccuracy and sloppy thinking, doesn't really matter that much to you.