To: Joe Hadenuf
Even better would be that all of McClintock's supporters actually vote for him and he wins.
11 posted on
10/01/2003 7:18:27 PM PDT by
forester
To: forester
Hehehe.....Man alive, that would be something...
14 posted on
10/01/2003 7:19:16 PM PDT by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: forester
Not clear it could happen. Newest poll out has
Arnold - 45%
Busty - 28%
Tom McC - 16%
You add Busty and Tom and you have 44% to Arnold's 45%. that is admittedly a statistical dead heat, but it appears that Arnold is SURGING.
20 posted on
10/01/2003 7:21:41 PM PDT by
fqued
(America, America, God shed His grace on thee.)
To: forester
From the East Coast... Go McClintock, he has no "Kennedy" ties and will not take Ca. into Global Gov't.
Vote your conscience, please from a former Californian whose VOTE was wasted for so many years trying to get the scum out of there.
McClintock CAN WIN!!!! you wouldn't be throwing your vote away.
D
34 posted on
10/01/2003 7:25:22 PM PDT by
Pee_Oui
To: forester
My politics are probably just as conservative as you, but I really think that even if McClintock could win, it would not be the best result for us. I actually believe that Arnold would be the only one who could have enough wide and popular support to actually force the legislature to acquiesce in the changes he wants made. If they remain stubborn, then Arnold could have a tremndous effect on the 2004 California legisilative elections, not to mention the effect he and this action -could have on Bush's chances of taking the state. Arnold has the potential ability to be the next Great Communicator.
38 posted on
10/01/2003 7:26:54 PM PDT by
ontos-on
To: forester
Damn. It didn't take you two miniutes to do exactly what the democrats hoped you would. They play you guys like a fiddle.
To: forester
...correction, five minutes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson