Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fedora; Nick Danger
O.K. That's it. It's the Vanity Fair article. It was a meeting of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee. And it did involve Kristof. But it was in May, 2003 -- not January, when the Dems decided to attack Bush's credibility.

Obviously, I conflated the two. However, this May meeting apparently afforded the Democrats an opportunity to further the program they agreed to undertake in January.

Consequently, we have a nexus for the plot. Wilson, Kristof, a bunch of Democrat pols (is Schumer on this committee, I wonder). And, within days, things begin to happen...

...Kristof "leaks" Wilson's report (anonymously)

...Somebody identified as "a CIA agent" leaks to the BBC.

...Pincus and the WaPo gets on the scent.

...Wilson gets an op-ed in the NYT.

...and they're off and running at Pimlico...

246 posted on 07/14/2005 7:04:55 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
Consequently, we have a nexus for the plot. Wilson, Kristof, a bunch of Democrat pols

Yes; and I think that this nexus was coordinating with a group of Clintonistas from CIA and State who had worked on Clinton's Iraq policy; and that this domestic nexus linked to foreign counterparts in Britain and France and elsewhere. The forged Niger documents initially came to British and US intelligence through Italy.

253 posted on 07/14/2005 8:20:38 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson