Here's what I don't understand; if she was undercover, which I doubt, and if she had kept her "cover" secret, how on earth was Karl Rove suppose to know she was UNDERCOVER?
Is he just not to EVER mention anybody's name just in case they happen to be in the CIA?
And if he had known she was undercover, was he just not suppose to mention the part about her getting him the job for the trip? Wouldn't that have been great? Wilson could have kept saying Cheney sent him and nobody could have contradicted him, right?
Wilson is upset because Rove said she was fair game; well, she inserted herself into this story, so she certainly is fair game, IMO.
Just like John Kerry said Mary Cheney was fair game.
Hi, Howlin. I think it's been pretty well established that Ms. Plame-Wilson had ceased being a covert operative in 1997. There was no crime committed in "outing" her. Either this prosecutor is completely misusing the relevant statute, or something else is going on in that Grand Jury. Unfortunately, I have zero faith in special prosecutors, so I would not be shocked if this one does something totally weird simply to justify the work he's been doing the last couple of years.