Probably. Innocent people do get framed, particularly when they go against the "grain".
The only attorney I would hire would be one to sue the living Clinton out of the National Enquirer and the people who sold the story to the Enquirer.
That's another possibility - and if not the Enquirer, then other interested parties.
Realistically, I certainly cannot guarantee Rush's innocence. I doubt his guilt, but obviously don't have all the facts (and I'll point out that nobody else here does either) from which to make a definate judgement. But, I do know that Rush is very bright, honest, and has strong convictions. I think he's building a stronger hand before he plays this one out. It certainly doesn't hurt to have an experienced gambler help decide which cards to toss and which ones to keep, particularly when it appears that the dealer and the other players might share the goal of making you lose.