To: snooker
Now that would be funny. But not as funny as your fantasy land "I need to defend Clinton Rush at any cost even before the facts are out" theory.
Great stuff, maybe you should write some scripts for TV, they are in bad need of fresh material.
51 posted on
10/03/2003 12:49:33 PM PDT by
Protagoras
(The only thing worse than drugs is the war on drugs)
To: Protagoras
One of the curious things I have noticed about Dims is they start name calling as soon as the argument doesn't go their way. Discussion isn't their strong suit.
Sounds like you might be suffering a Clinturd hangover.
53 posted on
10/03/2003 12:52:47 PM PDT by
snooker
To: Protagoras; snooker; All
"But not as funny as your fantasy land "I need to defend Clinton Rush at any cost even before the facts are out" theory."
Okay... good point; you got in a good joke.
But there is a huge difference between diehard Clinton defenders and Freepers here, who, within the space of 24 hours, have refused to condemn someone on the base of (left-leaning) media reports, someone who has consistently been a true patriot and a friend to conservatives across the country.
Sorry. Rush was the only voice of sanity for years when for me. I would drive around putting my son to sleep for naps and listen to Rush (then I would transfer my son to the bed, then put Rush back on). And when we moved to Canada in late summer 2000, well, after the election, I would sit listening to the scratchy broadcast out of New York to get him when the election was happening. He was the only source of information I could get about the crazy situation in Florida.
Sorry, but there is no comparison. This thing has just blown up in all our faces. There is no comparison with diehard Dems defending Clinton even after he lost his law license in Arkansas.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson