[DoughtyOne]

Did you know that NOW has been quite vocal on Schwarzenegger? Coupled with their silence on Clinton, there's all you needed to know about that organization.

Stick with Tom if that's what your concience has been telling you. We knew the sliming would come. I know the Hitler thing was a low blow, but that shouldn't pull you off your guy if you think he's better, and that is the overriding thing for you.

These women that have come forward have a right to be upset. I would have thought a lot more of them if they came out in public when these instances took place.

Schwarzenegger admitted to some of the activity. His appology while nice, is no blanket amnesty from me. Was what he did criminal? It may not have been. It was abysmal none the less.

I'll check out those links. Thank you.

[ambrose]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=106&e=1&u=/nypost/20031004/cm_nypost/sexlieshiddenagendas


Apart from the testimony of the groping victims, both of whom were convincing, the most honest thing I heard came from film producer and Codepink activist Patricia Foulkrod.





She admitted that Bill Clinton (news - web sites)'s sexual peccadilloes were as inexcusable as Arnold's.


"The difference is that Clinton was so brilliant," she said.


"If Arnold was a brilliant pol and had this thing about inappropriate behavior, we'd figure a way of getting around it. I think it's to our detriment to go on too much about the groping. But it's our way in. This is really about the GOP trying to take California in 2004 and our trying to stop it."