I have real problems with the "confidentiality of sources" when it comes to issues of national security. Novak knows, he should end the speculation and say. Yes, his career may take a hit. So what? Any more than the careers of either Plame or Pres. Bush? Why is his sacrosanct? To me it's a a double-standard that lets reporters of any political stripe get away with murder.
Here are the "8 Violations of Media Objectivity":
Violation #1 Misleading definitions and terminology.
By using terminology and definitions in a way that implies accepted fact, the media injects bias under the guise of objectivity.
Violation #2 Imbalanced reporting.
Media reports frequently skew the picture by presenting only one side of the story.
Violation #3 Opinions disguised as news.
An objective reporter should not use adjectives or adverbs, unless they are part of a quotation. Also, the source for any facts and opinions should be clear from the report, or alternatively it should be stated that source is intentionally undisclosed.
Violation #4 Lack of context.
By failing to provide proper context and full background information, journalists can dramatically distort the true picture.
Violation #5 Selective omission.
By choosing to report certain events over others, the media controls access to information and manipulates public sentiment.
Violation #6 Using true facts to draw false conclusions.
Media reports frequently use true facts to draw erroneous conclusions.
Violation #7 Distortion of facts.
In today's competitive media world, reporters frequently do not have the time, inclination or resources to properly verify information before submitting a story for publication.
Violation #8 Creating news instead of reporting it. Deliberately holding stories until the last minute before an election.
See Media Ethics <http://www.people.vcu.edu/~jcsouth/hotlists/ethics.htm>