Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobson
Typical lies from the editors saying they aren't biased and weren't taking direction from the Rats.
6 posted on 10/05/2003 11:14:43 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jimbo123
Note that the Times's editor stupidly admits THEY created this story by harassing any female in Hollywood they could get to answer the phone, until they were able to gin up enough women willing to make the claim. No wonder it took them weeks to accomplish!:
Carroll said the reporters had, for the most part, made "cold calls" to people in the film industry after hearing that Schwarzenegger had a reputation for mistreating women. For instance, he said, they had called women listed in the credits of movies starring Schwarzenegger.
What more proof do you need that the Los Angeles Times WANTED to make this story happen, instead of merely reporting?
22 posted on 10/05/2003 12:16:56 PM PDT by Timesink (For a good time, visit clark2004.meetup.com. Ask for Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jimbo123
Typical lies from the editors saying they aren't biased and weren't taking direction from the Rats.

In addition to that, I watched the Sunday news programs and not one of them stated in their coverage of the Arnold "Hitler" story that the LA Slimes had retracted their previous story when they obviously got it wrong.

All they covered was the fact that the Slimes ran a story stating that Arnold said he admired Hitler. Agenda? What agenda?

48 posted on 10/05/2003 1:59:49 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson