Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California gun owners, George Bush is watching you
Keep and Bear Arms ^ | October 6, 2003 | David Codrea

Posted on 10/05/2003 9:39:47 PM PDT by Mini-14

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: Charles Martel
The federal law (1994 Assault Weapons ban) is what Schwarzenegger was most likely referring to.

No, most likely you're just sourcelessly inventing things out of thin air.

California's state law re: registering or banning assault weapons (Roberti-Roos, signed into law by a *Republican*, IIRC)

Arnold's campaign adviser Pete Wilson.

81 posted on 10/06/2003 1:56:48 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Heh

"Tom will veto" nothing. He's unelectable.

Well, we're clearly not going to convince each other at this point, and perhaps I should have used the conditional "would". Regardless, the tendency of the Tom and Arnold camps to talk past each other is one of the most frustrating aspects of this whole enterprise. Look, I think that an objective review of the FACTS show that Tom, with the support from the state and national Republican parties that is flowing to Arnold could win. But, that's water under the bridge at this point, and will be a topic of contention for at least the next several years in the party here in California.

And.. -- You have no real evidence Arnie would sign either bill..

No, just that he's on record favoring 'common sense gun control'. That hasn't worked out so well for us the past few decades or so, so I'm giving Arnold the benefit of the doubt, and taking him at his word.

Once elected, he may surprise us all as a one term reformer on individual liberties. If he doesn't, -- what have we lost? Nothing, I guess, except the remnants of a Republican party in this state that was distinguished in some degree of kind from the Democrat party.

82 posted on 10/06/2003 2:15:46 PM PDT by absalom01 (They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Sorry, you threw me there with the "enhanced and extended" comment. Does Roberti-Roos have a sunset provision? I thought that was just the federal '94 Crime Bill's AW ban.

Barbara Feinstein added to my impression on this matter when she cast snide remarks at Arnold for using all those evil assault weapons in his movies. She was trying to drum up support for her efforts to expand and make permanent the federal ban. Political candidates in states much more pro-gun than California are being asked about the assault weapons ban. For the media, it's a nation-wide litmus test.

83 posted on 10/06/2003 3:37:29 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Young Rhino
"I'm actually to the right of about 90% of those who post here. The difference is that I'll vote for the candidate who reflects some of my views rather than sit by and watch a candidate win who opposes everything that I believe."

You have stated the dilemma for most folks at FreeRepublic.com . How does anyone resolve anything so that the basic right of self defense such as the RKBA in the 2nd Amendment, as opposed to the rats mess in California, is decided in a rational manner? If anything it undermines anything but a vast right wing conspiracy.

People get the gov't that they deserve. If I lived in California, then I would have to say Adios Arnold.


84 posted on 10/07/2003 1:42:24 AM PDT by neverdem (Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
"...former Republican Party National Chair Lee Atwater’s cynical dismissal, “Where else do [they] have to go?”

How about, "home," Lee? Wherever the Hell you are?

What will they say when we simply stay home?

85 posted on 10/07/2003 6:59:06 AM PDT by Redbob (P14, cocked & locked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Young Rhino
"If anything it undermines anything but a vast right wing conspiracy."

Excuse me. It should have been written "it undermines any vast right wing conspiracy". Arnold barely has his toes right of center.



86 posted on 10/07/2003 8:51:11 AM PDT by neverdem (Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson