Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Media and Democrat's bias on this have but a stop to the war on terrorism. This is ugly partisanship at its worst.
1 posted on 10/06/2003 1:49:40 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered

2 posted on 10/06/2003 1:51:54 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Molly Pitcher

3 posted on 10/06/2003 2:00:52 AM PDT by The Raven (<==see my home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Unless there's a warehouse full of drones(he did have some),missiles loaded with mustard gas,barrels of WMD,powdered anthrax,and uranium,the media says..nothing found...the war is a fraud.
4 posted on 10/06/2003 2:04:27 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

"We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002."

Seems to be plenty of justification for our intervention, provided your head isn't stuck in the sand.
5 posted on 10/06/2003 2:05:45 AM PDT by Aeronaut (In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Bump
8 posted on 10/06/2003 3:39:23 AM PDT by knighthawk (And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
BTTT
9 posted on 10/06/2003 3:40:37 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Bump!
11 posted on 10/06/2003 4:00:30 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
"West Virginia Democrat Jay Rockefeller walked out of the Kay briefing to assert his dismay that nothing he'd heard proved Saddam's threat was "imminent" and thus pre-emption is wrong in all cases. In fact, the Bush Administration never subscribed to the "imminence" test when making its case for deposing Saddam. Mr. Bush flatly rejected it in this year's State of the Union address as too risky."

Once again the liberals are attempting to rewrite history to fit their agenda.

I guess one should not be surprised; it is their way.
15 posted on 10/06/2003 4:22:24 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
If Kay brought in Saydamn sitting on a truck load of nukes, the democracts would say 'not enough evidence to go to war over'. N-O-T-H-I-N-G will change their tune.
18 posted on 10/06/2003 4:28:34 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (The sun comes up, the sun goes down, what is important is what is done between the two events.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
I wonder if it would be helpful for the President to have a primetime speech, going over the highlights of the interim report? Face it, people aren't going to read it themseleves and will only read what the media wants them to know. Bush has to let the American people know what's really going on.
21 posted on 10/06/2003 4:31:10 AM PDT by ReaganRevolution (Don't believe the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Most of those "No WMD Found" articles were written before Kay released his report. The authors just had to insert a quote or two lifted out of context from the report and publish them after the report came out.
23 posted on 10/06/2003 4:37:28 AM PDT by alnick (The truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
BTTT
24 posted on 10/06/2003 4:42:37 AM PDT by The Mayor (I asked God for a friend, He gave me all of YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
The truth of the matter is that Libs and 'Rats don't care whether there were WMD's or not. Issues are only mechanisms to bash Bush - and have no intrinsic value or import beyond that.

They just as easily turn on a dime and scream like the bloody infantile jerks they are - about us NOT taking down someone with WMD's. Like Korea for example. Listen to them bitch about that.."Well if you're all so worried about WMD's - how come you're not doing nothing about Korea? Huh?" Thing is, they're too stupid to realize that once our terrorist enemies cross the Rubicon into actually HAVING serious WMD's - then we lose our options in combatting them.

In a perfect world - they would be the only ones to suffer the penalty of their murderous selfishness and stupidity.
26 posted on 10/06/2003 4:52:44 AM PDT by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Both are postwar inventions, and transparently political devices to portray the war in Iraq in the worst possible light.

Remeber Daschle's comment accusing the Bush Administration of politicizing the war? I don't understand why Republicans are not replaying tiny Tom's remarks and firing back at this BS.

33 posted on 10/06/2003 7:40:29 AM PDT by slimer (i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
STATEMENT BY DAVID KAY ON THE INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE IRAQ SURVEY GROUP (ISG)

http://www.odci.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

Here are some theories about Iraq's WMD program:

1. Saddam had a program and moved the most important/damaging/incriminating material to Syria. [Wouldn't our sattelites have picked this up? If they have, the Bush admin is not telling]

2. Saddam thought he had a program, but his WMD people were lying to him. [That would explain why he obstructed without having a program.]

3. Saddam had no program, he was bluffing [playing poker]. He acted like he did, so if an invasion did occur, he would simply need to survive a war of attrition while his enemies were discredited for coming in for nothing.

4. Saddam had no program, Bush and Blair knew it, but were hell-bent on 'getting' Saddam for whatever reason. [The favorite Leftist theory.]

5. Any others?
38 posted on 10/06/2003 10:24:08 AM PDT by walford (I don't relish telling you that the emperor is wearing no clothes. It has to be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
"Kay's team found a prison laboratory complex "possibly used in human testing of BW agents"


Truly frightening. Those poor people.
43 posted on 10/06/2003 12:17:17 PM PDT by diamond6 ("Everyone who is for abortion HAS been born." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson