Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roeper:Funny how this time there's no Rush to judgment (MOTHER OF ALL BARF ALERTS!!!!)
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | October 6, 2003 | Richard Roeper

Posted on 10/06/2003 12:19:12 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist

"It's easy for people to say that if they shoot up on heroin the only people they're hurting are themselves. But that's not true. ... Drug abusers destroy their families ... If we legalize these vices, we erode the societal support for prohibitions against crimes such as murder. The erosion of the moral fabric of society is a gradual, insidious process."

-- Rush Limbaugh, The Way Things Ought to Be, pp 53-54.

As I sifted through hundreds of comments from Rush Limbaugh fans over the last week, some interesting trends emerged.

About 50 percent just wanted to call me names. (Of course, nearly all of those e-mails were anonymous.) I'm not sure what that's all about. Maybe it's just a case of trying to feel better about yourself as you hunch over the keyboard in your bedroom while your mom yells, "You're 37 years old, when are you going to move out!"

Much of the feedback came in AFTER it was reported that Limbaugh allegedly purchased thousands of painkillers from an illegal drug ring in Florida, and after Limbaugh tip-toed through his radio show last Friday, saying things like, "Just trust me on this," and, "I'm going to come clean when I get all the facts and details," and, "I really don't know the full scope of what I'm dealing with ... rest assured, I will discuss this with you and tell you how it is ... maybe more than you really want to know about this."

Gee, didn't Limbaugh rip Bill Clinton for talking like that?

But the man's entitled to a presumption of innocence until charged, let alone proven guilty. Still, I'm wondering why Limbaugh didn't say: "Folks, I've never illegally purchased any drug at any time in my life."

In any case, hardly any of the dittoheads who contacted me even mentioned the scandal. I guess they're waiting for all the facts to come in before passing judgment -- just as they'd do if Al Franken were the one who might have been popping OxyContins like Skittles.

I'm right, I'm right! I quit!

Curiously, few of Limbaugh's defenders talked about his jelly-spined resignation from ESPN.

On Wednesday, Limbaugh told his radio audience, "All this is really oriented around the fact that I was right," and, "[T]he point is, I'm right about it. I'll say it again today. I'm dead right about it.... "

And then, hours later, Limbaugh quit. You'd think his position would have been: "If ESPN has a problem with me, they can fire me." But El Rushbo said he didn't want to make life difficult for the fine folks at ESPN, so he was stepping down.

Geez. What a wuss.

About 60 percent of the Limbaugh supporters I heard from were fixated on one topic: my assertions that Limbaugh once told a caller, "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back," and that on another occasion he said of blacks, "They are 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?"

More than 100 e-mailers, many using strikingly similar language, asked me for my sources.

According to FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), Limbaugh made the first comment in the 1970s. The quote is on FAIR's Web site, and it was in the book The Way Things Aren't.

I also relied on an Oct. 8, 1990, story in Newsday, in which Limbaugh admits saying, "Have you ever noticed how all newspaper composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?" The article continues with a quote from Limbaugh: " 'You may interpret it as [racist], but, I, no honest to God, that's not how I intended it all ... I am the least racist host you'll ever find.' Recalling a stint as an 'insult-radio' DJ in Pittsburgh, he admits feeling guilty about, for example, telling a black listener he could not understand to 'take that bone out of your nose and call me back.' "

One assumes Limbaugh wouldn't have conveyed feelings of guilt to the Newsday reporter if he never said it. Nor could I find any record of Limbaugh contacting Newsday after the article to deny the Pittsburgh anecdote.

Rush on race

The "12 percent" comment has been cited by FAIR, by dozens of other media sources and by the Flush Rush Quarterly. In October 2000, MSNBC's Lisa Myers said to Limbaugh, "You once told a caller ... '[Blacks] are 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?' That's a little bit harsh."

Rush replied: "I really don't remember if I said, 'Who the hell cares?' The, this, but this is a salient point. Twelve, 14 percent of the population is what, is, is, my point, and if somebody says like on my radio, my TV show, said, 'Well, we don't see very many black people there,' 'Oh, what are you basing it on?' 'Well, there's a percentage of the population. Why aren't they represented?' "

Oh. OK.

However, I will say that if I erred, it was in not going with some of Limbaugh's equally appalling but more easily confirmed quotes about race. Lord knows they're out there.

But I am heartened to learn that so many of Limbaugh's fans are such sticklers for accuracy and accountability. I'm sure they hold their guy to the same standards, day in and day out.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barf; barforama; barrrfffff; chunkblower; doublestandards; hurl; liberalbias; limbaugh; mediabias; megabarfer; norwalk; puke; roeper; rush; rushbashing; spew; technicoloryawn; upchuck; vomit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Read'it and puke.
1 posted on 10/06/2003 12:19:13 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)

2 posted on 10/06/2003 12:20:59 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
I would try to read it but sentence structure and overall flow of ideas in writing is a big vice of mine when I read columns. Ill pass.
3 posted on 10/06/2003 12:22:18 PM PDT by smith288 (Opinions expressed on this post are smith288s and not neccessarily those of Freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: RightWingAtheist
Everyone loves to run down a man who stands up against vice. That relieves the conscience of every sluggard and mediocrity who does otherwise.

Roeper's anal dump is only the first of many that will mine the same pathetic vein of human vindictiveness. Roeper is a living argument contra the process of species evolution. His ignorant knee-jerking makes me think our society is steadily in decadent decline.
5 posted on 10/06/2003 12:23:53 PM PDT by .cnI redruM ("We hang petty thieves, we elevate the great ones to public office." Aesop, 600BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
Boy, Roeper is a BORING, disjointed writer.

He's right that Limbaugh was wimpy to quit ESPN. I guess the fact that bigger brushfires sprung up was the reason.

6 posted on 10/06/2003 12:25:49 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
Hellloooo....Ayn Rand? George Santayana? Sydney Hook?
7 posted on 10/06/2003 12:26:08 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
Sooner or later, we will all be bitten on the arse by this WOD. It's insane to declare war on ourselves.
8 posted on 10/06/2003 12:26:18 PM PDT by Lexington Green (A race-based double-standard IS racism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
Another nobody trying to be a somebody by using Limbaugh's name.
9 posted on 10/06/2003 12:28:51 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
He's right that Limbaugh was wimpy to quit ESPN

I think it was quit or get fired. Personally, it was better to resign IMHO.

10 posted on 10/06/2003 12:36:49 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Leaving aside the contract implications (you don't get paid if you quit), I still think he should have made them fire him.

Resigning looked like an admission of guilt.

11 posted on 10/06/2003 12:38:59 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I agree with you. This is very poorly written. Some paragraphs, I actually had to read twice.
12 posted on 10/06/2003 12:39:20 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead
Resigning looked like an admission of guilt.

I totally agree. The upside of resigning is that he won't get the reputation of bringing down the cast of characters thus preserving his "sports viability" in the future.

13 posted on 10/06/2003 12:41:34 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
What's more irrelevant than the opinion of Roger Ebert?

the opinion of Roger Ebert's rumpswab, Dick Roeper.

Dick Roeper, but don't let him dick you.

14 posted on 10/06/2003 12:53:22 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
Rush's comments are the best thing that ever happened to Donavan McNabb. Sometimes I feel the best thing that ever happened to the Democrats was godless conservative talk radio. All the claims of being "on the right", without any serious aknowledgement of who is the Author of our rights. Now we have the great Arnold as a result of this massive influence of conservative talk radio, to really destroy the party.
15 posted on 10/06/2003 12:56:12 PM PDT by Russell Scott (Without massive intervention from Heaven, America doesn't have a prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Everyone loves to run down a man who stands up against vice.

If that were the case there would be no ridiculous War on Drugs. But as for Rush, if he's going to sell books advocating a War on Drugs, then he had better be prepared to be hoisted by his own petard when his head is caught in a vice.

16 posted on 10/06/2003 1:11:06 PM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: ravinson
I agree, much better to dwell on Rush's pill problem than to seriously combat the $$$$billions that cross our borders like a sewage flood every year for substances like cocaine and heroin.

If we just got rid of all those inconvenient drug laws, we wouldn't have a drug problem anymore. The same could be said about prison rape, larceny and murder.

Rush becomes a flawed messenger because of his own failings, but that does not undermine the inherent truth of what the man said. The last time any human being on Earth completely lived by example, there was a new star shining in the East.

18 posted on 10/06/2003 1:20:55 PM PDT by .cnI redruM ("We hang petty thieves, we elevate the great ones to public office." Aesop, 600BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
You guys just give me the creeps

Funny, I usually get that when I tell people I'm a conservative.

19 posted on 10/06/2003 1:21:43 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
I've actually read FAIR's book on Limbaugh (someone gave it to me as a Christmas present). It's about 1/3rd accurate (Rush does make mistakes) but most of those things are relatively minor (on the same scale as the Bill O'Reilly "Peabody" statement). About 1/3rd of it is exaggeration (making a mountain out of a mole-hill -- generally something Rush said to be funny or over-the-top). And about 1/3rd of it is just wrong and takes things he said out of context. I imagine the 12% line is an "out of context" remark.
20 posted on 10/06/2003 1:23:59 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson