[norton]

Tsk,

Then I'll just have to excerpt from a prior post:

"....American Fence Contractors Association - California Chapter
American Public Works Association - Sacramento Chapter
American Public Works Association - Southern California Chapter
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers - San Diego Section
American Society of Civil Engineers - San Francisco Section
American Society of Civil Engineers - Los Angeles Section
Associated General Contractors of California
Associated General Contractors of America - San Diego Chapter
Association of California Water Agencies
Automobile Club of Southern California
Bay Area Council
California Alliance for Jobs
California Association of REALTORS®
California Association of Sanitation Agencies
California Business Properties Association ...."

And be satisfied that a whole lot of people looking to boost their profits out of the state's already strained economy - won't.

[AFPhys]

YOU may not feel that providing infrastructure is one of the most important functions of state government, but I do. When CA is spending under 1/2%, and the politicians are not admonished in some way to do so, then it is no wonder jobs are leaving that state. It was not long ago that CA was spending about 20% on that.

It appears from your list that those on it are not "labor unions" in general, but are those who are interested in jobs for CA. Both "RINO-Arnie" and "McKlintock" support #53 - (I have no dog in this fight - I would like to see CA become a viable state again.) In contrast, the "no on 53" folks are indeed heavily (teachers & other welfare agent) union associated.

I'm sorry you were duped by the "Busta & 53" ad campaign, as you said in post 612.

Truth sometimes hurts, I know, but sometimes it is best to simply state you were duped, than to keep defending a mistake.