1 posted on
10/07/2003 4:00:03 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Brian S
I doubt it came from the Administration.
But I wonder how Bush saying they may never find out takes the pressure off of the clammering for a special prosecutor.
2 posted on
10/07/2003 4:01:24 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/07/2003 4:02:20 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Brian S
"In my view, it is shameful and unethical that an administration that promised to govern with 'honor and integrity' and 'change the tone' in Washington has now engaged in an orchestrated campaign to smear and intimidate truth-telling critics, placing them in possible physical harm and impairing the efforts and operations of the CIA," Conyers said. Now where is that total board listing the numbers of prosecutions and so forth from the previous administration which Conyers defended?
4 posted on
10/07/2003 4:11:00 PM PDT by
DrewsDad
To: Brian S
For what it's worth, I have but 2 names in mind when I think of who leaked Valerie Plame's profession; Iosef Wilson and Val herself.
5 posted on
10/07/2003 4:11:52 PM PDT by
steveegg
(I have one thing to say to the lurkers; FREEPATHON!)
To: Brian S
7 posted on
10/07/2003 4:22:05 PM PDT by
DrewsDad
To: Brian S
Wait I know. It was Rush Limbaugh while he was in a drug inuduced stupor hanging out with Arnold groping women at the singles bar, wasn't it ?
11 posted on
10/07/2003 4:36:34 PM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Brian S
According to Novak, he called the CIA and they confirmed her employment. The only thing they would not confirm was the nature of her employment.
In other words, the CIA outed her.
This is something the CIA doesn't do, and yet they did it.
12 posted on
10/07/2003 4:42:19 PM PDT by
marron
To: Brian S
I kind of doubt that this trophy wife of a clinton appointed ambassador was all that involved with spying on terrorist or communist or drug trafficers.
More likely, aside from this being some more non-sticking attack on conservatives, they are just pissed off that a democrat won't get her full retirement package.
Funny, I never heard this much bru-ha-ha when hillary had her hands on the throats of those travel office workers!
(please keep in mind if any of these words are mispelled,...I was absent the day they taught spelling.)
To: Brian S
Now that I think of it, I think Bush should come right out and say, "We have no idea who leaked this story. The only person who knows is Robert Novak." Novak should be called to testify since he is the one who leaked the information about Plame.
That would put the press in a cleft stick. They are the ones howling for blood. Well, let them howl. If they think the name of the leaker is so important, let them push to have the Justice Department make Novak talk. Then we'll all know, and it won't take a lot of man hours or money to find out.
Do they think a reporter's sources are sacred? Then they should shut up about this whole business. Which is more important to them, finding the truth or protecting their special privileges?
16 posted on
10/07/2003 5:20:30 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Brian S
"This is a large administration and there's a lot of senior officials," Bush told journalists. "I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is, partially because, in all due respect to your profession, you do a very good job of protecting the leakers." Excellent, expose the media for the criminals they are!
To: Brian S
If they really want to get at the truth on who leaked what, why don't the investigators just go to the NSA and pull all of the telephone, fax and e-mail of Robert Novak? It should not be very hard from there to narrow it down to a few suspects.
Also it was a a pretty open secret on the Georgetown cocktail circuit that Wilson's wife was a CIA employee.
Don't forget also that Wilson's wife works for a division of the CIA on weapons proliferation and indirectly recommended that her husband be hired as a consultant for the agency to go to Niger to check out the uranium story.
The more you dig into this mess the more questions that come up.
To: Brian S
Although the CIA has known to screw up, one would have to believe that Wilson was sent on purpose. If he was there to sip mint tea, he was ... a decoy. Recently Wilson starts running his mouth about no WMD and the CIA gets nervous. Who other than the CIA would want to shut him down? Which leads me to believe:
A) There is WMD evidence and sources that need protected
B) The 'Rats know nothing about it because they are a security leak
To: Brian S
The one that leaked her name is the one that lives with her.
If joe wilson looks in the mirroe, he will see who it is.
I will say that the sob in the CIA that sent him to Africa should be fired.
21 posted on
10/07/2003 7:28:06 PM PDT by
sport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson