Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Says Three Senior Aides Innocent in Leak
Reuters ^ | 10/07/03

Posted on 10/07/2003 9:21:19 PM PDT by kattracks

By Randall Mikkelsen

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Tuesday said it had ruled out three senior aides as possible sources for a leak disclosing the name of a CIA operative and President Bush said the case may never be resolved.

"I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is," Bush told reporters after he met with his Cabinet. "I'd like to. I want to know the truth."

Bush spoke ahead of a 5 p.m. White House deadline on Tuesday for officials to turn over information wanted by Justice Department investigators probing the leak, which has become the latest controversy surrounding Bush's decision to go to war against Iraq.

Spokesman Scott McClellan said senior Bush political aide Karl Rove, vice presidential chief of staff Lewis Libby and National Security Council senior director Elliott Abrams had each denied leaking the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Plame's husband, former diplomat Joseph Wilson, had publicly opposed Bush on a key element of his case for war and has accused the administration of disclosing Plame's name in retaliation.

McClellan said he talked to each of the three officials in response to news reports they may have been involved in the leak. "They were not involved in leaking classified information, nor did they condone it," McClellan said.

Abrams pleaded guilty in 1991 of lying to Congress in the Iran-Contra controversy, and was pardoned by former President George Bush.

Democratic U.S. Rep. John Conyers of Michigan urged Rove to resign. In a letter to the Bush aide, Conyers accused him of seeking to give the leak "wider currency" even if he may not have been the source.

Bush said he did not know whether the criminal probe, begun after a CIA request, would find who leaked Plame's name.

"I've instructed this staff of mine to cooperate fully with the investigators, full disclosure," he said. But he said Washington was "full of people who like to leak information," and the media was practiced at protecting sources.

POLITICAL DAMAGE FOR BUSH?

The issue has threatened further political damage for Bush, whose poll standing has been hurt by continued instability in Iraq following the U.S.-led invasion in March.

Wilson has accused the administration of leaking Plame's name after he criticized Bush claims that Iraq had tried to acquire nuclear-weapons material in Africa.

The claims, which had been investigated by Wilson in Niger in a mission for the CIA, were part of Bush's case for war but the White House later said the evidence was unsubstantiated.

Tuesday's deadline was self-imposed by the White House, in response to a Justice Department order.

White House Chief of Staff Andy Card on Tuesday urged "thorough, diligent and timely" compliance in a memo to staffers.

"The sooner we complete the search and delivery of documents, the sooner the Justice Department can complete its inquiry -- and the sooner we can all return our full attention to doing the work of the people," Card said.

White House counsel Alberto Gonzales last week directed staffers to hand over any records relating to Wilson and Plame or Wilson's trip to Niger.

Also sought were records of contacts with columnist Robert Novak, who disclosed Plame's CIA job in July, and Timothy M. Phelps and Knut Royce of Newsday, who cited intelligence officials as confirming Novak's story.

McClellan said responses would be collected by Gonzales's office before being turned over. The White House was unlikely to give the investigators any material on Tuesday, he said.

He said the Justice Department had set a variety of deadlines over the next two weeks.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: leak

1 posted on 10/07/2003 9:21:19 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
President Bush's Poll ratings must be up..... because we haven't seen any polls for a week now!

If we don't see a poll showing Bush slipping by this time next week, we will see poll results from Europe being published

2 posted on 10/07/2003 9:25:42 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections

Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 10/07/2003 9:26:53 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It could vey well have been a democrat hold over who talked. They never worried about the CIA or national security anyway.
If the FBI were smart, they'd check out the Clintonites still there first. Who else would enjoy the scandle? It's motive.
4 posted on 10/07/2003 9:32:45 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
President Bush's Poll ratings must be up..... because we haven't seen any polls for a week now!

Still above Clinton during his presidency at this time, no doubt. Bush has always stayed above the Clinton numbers.

5 posted on 10/07/2003 9:34:21 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Still above Reagan as well
6 posted on 10/07/2003 9:42:29 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Still above Reagan as well

And the democrats (O'DOH!) are orgasmic when it drops down one point. Sigh.

7 posted on 10/07/2003 9:49:05 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Weird how Reuters "neglected" to frame the partisan nature of Wilson's attack and "forgot" to describe how utterly weak Wilson's Niger investigation was. (/sarcasm)
8 posted on 10/07/2003 9:59:30 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"If the FBI were smart, they'd check out the Clintonites still there first. Who else would enjoy the scandle? It's motive"

Well, they absolutely should; will be frustrating to see if they choose a more PC way of handling this.

Also hope they include Mr. Wilson, and his wife; and their friends. . .in their investigation.

Judging from Mr. Wilson's contributions thus far, would indicate that he should take a lie detector test as well.

9 posted on 10/07/2003 10:01:20 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
and "forgot" to describe how utterly weak Wilson's Niger investigation was.

Weak? How can you portray his investigation as weak? Why he drank sweet mint tea, for God's sake! For an entire week, no less! Weak?

10 posted on 10/08/2003 7:29:09 AM PDT by kevao (Fuques France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson