Ten Commandments Supporters Jailed: A Personal Account

On Sunday, October 5, 2003, I walked a block from my hotel in Washington, D.C. to St. Matthew’s Cathedral on Rhode Island Avenue. A 10 a.m. service was scheduled at the church, where the Red Mass would be celebrated—a service held prior to the beginning of a new session of the U.S. Supreme Court and which the Supreme Court justices normally attend.

I was walking with two ladies with whom I had been travelling on the Spirit of Montgomery Save the Commandments caravan from Montgomery, Alabama to Washington, D.C. When we approached the block where St. Matthew’s is located, we crossed the street behind police barricades that had been set up to block vehicle traffic on the street immediately in front of the church. Police officers told us to walk up the sidewalk nearest the church, which we did. There was a police line on the edge of the sidewalk on the far side of the street from the church.

We arrived in front of the church within a few seconds and I greeted a pastor who had been travelling with us. He stated that he was going in the church for the service but that others of our group were down at the far end of the sidewalk, outside of the police line, and that the police would not let them come inside the line if they were carrying signs with the Ten Commandments printed on them.

I spoke with others who were entering the church or passing by on the sidewalk. There was, in my estimation, in excess of a thousand people who were standing on the steps of the church or on the sidewalk in front of the church, all who were apparently waiting to enter the church for the service. There were also numerous others who were freely walking the sidewalks, whether they were simply passing down the sidewalk, coming to join the throng entering the church, or observing the crowd. Across the street, on the sidewalk opposite the church, were three or four television cameras and crews, as well as a couple of wandering news photographers.

After speaking with various people in front of the church, I crossed the street. There, I approached the police line, from inside the line, and spoke to a man standing outside of the line. He informed me that the police had instructed him not to come inside the line because he was holding a pole with a U.S. flag and a cross on it. There were several law enforcement officers who saw me inside the police line and who saw me speaking with this man outside of the line. These officers were located at various places: on the steps of the church, on the sidewalk in front of the church, on the street in front of the church, on the sidewalk across the street from the church, and standing at the far end of the block next to the police tape. One or more of these officers in each of these areas observed my free movement within the area inside the police line. At no point was I asked to leave the area.

After speaking to the man with the flag, I walked a few steps down the sidewalk to where the media personnel were located. I stood a few feet from them, observing the crowd. Two of my fellow Alabama citizens, Matt and Alicia Carden, who had been travelling with the caravan, walked up and stood beside me and we began talking. At that time, the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, one of the caravan organizers, walked up and stood immediately beside the television crews. He was holding a sign with the Ten Commandments printed on it. The Cardens and I walked over and stood beside the Rev. Mahoney.

Within a few seconds, federal marshals wearing business attire approached the Rev. Mahoney. The marshals told the Rev. Mahoney that he could not stand there with the sign. The Rev. Mahoney replied that he was going to stand there and that the marshals could arrest him if they had to. The marshals took the Rev. Mahoney by the arms and began leading him toward the far end of the block, where the other people with signs were standing. When the Rev. Mahoney tried to go down on his knees, the marshals dragged him outside of the police line—which had, by that time, been extended across the entire end of the street—and released him.

The Rev. Mahoney immediately turned around, ducked under the police tape, and walked down the same sidewalk toward the area where he had previously been standing. He stopped about twenty feet away from the previous point and stood with the Ten Commandments sign. Mr. Carden then went over to the police line and took a Ten Commandments sign from one of the people there. He then came over and stood beside the Rev. Mahoney. The federal marshals grasped the Rev. Mahoney’s hand and handcuffed him, causing him to drop his sign. They also seized Mr. Carden, causing him to drop his sign near one of the police cars. Mrs. Carden picked up the sign that the Rev. Mahoney had dropped. The marshals seized Mrs. Carden, causing her to drop the sign. The Rev. Mahoney called to Troy Newman, another member of our group, to take pictures of the arrests.

Seeing that the Ten Commandments sign was lying on the street, being trampled by the boots of federal marshals wearing tactical equipment and carrying machine guns, I reached down and picked up the sign. I held the sign above my head. During this time, the marshals were handcuffing the Cardens. One of the marshals pointed toward me and said three or four times, “We need to get this one.” After the Rev. Mahoney and the Cardens had been handcuffed and lined up against the rear of one of the police cars, one of the marshals approached me. The marshal said, “Sir, put down the sign.” I replied, “No, sir.” He then grasped my left arm and twisted it behind my back, then grasped my right arm, doing the same, which caused me to drop the sign. He then handcuffed me and pushed me against the side of police car, next to the others who had been arrested.

The marshals then had us sit down on the curb, with our feet in the street. Mr. Newman, who was standing approximately ten feet or more away from the officers and us, was approached by one of the officers, who seized him. Another officer took Mr. Newman’s camera and handcuffed him. The marshals had Mr. Newman sit on the curb beside us.

The Rev. Donald Ely, another of our group, came from inside the church, where he had been sitting, waiting for the service to begin. He walked over to us and stood, asking what was going on. The marshals told the Rev. Ely to go outside of the police line. He stated that he wanted to stand there with us. The marshals again told him to go outside of the line, that they did not want to arrest him because he had done nothing wrong. The Rev. Ely affirmed that he had done nothing wrong and insisted that the others of us had done nothing wrong, either. He asked the marshals what we had done wrong. They refused to answer him and, when he refused to walk away, they handcuffed him and had him sit on the curb beside us.

The Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police were present but were not involved in the arrests. The marshals had us placed in police cars belonging to the Metro Police. We were eventually taken to the Second District Headquarters station of the Metro Police. We were required to remove our belts, shoelaces, watches, rings, necklaces, and everything from our pockets. The five men were placed in a large holding cell and Mrs. Carden was placed in a small female holding cell. After approximately one hour, a marshal dressed in street clothes came to speak to us. He stated that he had been called out of his church service to come process us. He collected our names and other information. A few minutes later, the same marshal came back to verify some additional information. This time, two other marshals who were in uniform accompanied him.

After we furnished the information to the marshals, we continued to wait in the cell. After several hours, the first marshal returned. He told us that we could each pay $300 each and we would be released. We would have to return the next morning for a hearing to set a trial date. Based on previous experience, the Rev. Mahoney and Mr. Newman stated that this was not appropriate. They insisted that the D.C. “post and forfeit” arrangement should apply in this incident. The marshal left us. He returned a few minutes later and stated that we could each pay $100 as a post and forfeit and we would be free to leave. The Rev. Mahoney insisted that this was not the usual fine. He also requested that he be released on his own recognizance and have his day in court. The marshal again left and returned a few minutes later. This time, the marshal stated that were being charged with crossing a police line and that we could each pay $25 post and forfeit and we would be released. We agreed to this, with the exception of the Rev. Mahoney. The Rev. Mahoney and Mr. Newman informed the rest of us that the usual post and forfeit amount is $50.

We were each photographed and fingerprinted. The Rev. Mahoney was allowed to speak to someone over the telephone in order to provide the information necessary for his release. The rest of us were then required to pay our $25 fine. Then, each of us was required to give our thumbprints on paperwork. Shortly thereafter, we were each let out of the cell, given our belongings, and released. We walked around the building and entered the front of the police station, where we called for someone to pick us up.

It is important to note that, although we were charged with crossing a police line, some of us did not cross the line. It is also important to note that hundreds of other people were indiscriminately allowed to come inside the police line. Only those who were holding Ten Commandments signs were forbidden to enter. It is again important to note that I was not arrested until I refused to put down the Ten Commandments sign; at no point was I ever told not to enter the police line, nor was I told to go outside of the police line. Regardless of what the police actually charged us with, the arrests resulted from the fact that four of us held Ten Commandments signs.

It is also important to note that the executive branch of our federal government has the power to enforce laws; in other words, these federal marshals who arrested us are under the direct jurisdiction of the president. On Monday, October 6, I spoke in person about this abuse of power with Mr. H. Goodloe Sutton, Jr., a staff member of U.S. Senator Richard Shelby, and Ms. Jenny Bottegal DiJames, a staff member of U.S. Representative Bud Cramer. Both seemed concerned about this issue, but gave no indication as to how the congressmen might respond.

The above information is a true and correct representation of the events described.

There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

So, it is illegal to hold a sign saying "10 Commandments," but it is ok to hold a sign in front of our troops that says, "baby killers?"

We truly live in strange times.

Come quickly, Lord Jesus.

What was the excuse/position of law enforcement regarding these events?

Do you have links to news coverage?

This needs careful but tough minded publicity, and folks must not make stupid mistakes that make the members of the 10 Commandments Movement look foolish.

Please keep the information flowing.

Keep Faith,

Richard F.

When we are reported to the authorities and persecuted and jailed for our proclaiming the Holy Word of God, and His Son Christ Jesus, we must rejoice, for the day draws near!

This was one of the signs (all of which are now coming to pass) that Jesus told His followers to watch for, signifying the End Times, and the nearness of His Glorious Appearing.

Other signs we were told to watch for were the re-emergence of the Roman Empire (EU) and the re-established borders of the Nation State of Israel.

It was predicted over 2,000 years ago, and it's all happening NOW! Let those who have eyes, see. Let those who have ears, hear.

Can I get an AMEN?

They were told to not hold the sign inside the police line. The Rev. Mahoney was even taken off the grounds once for violation of this, without being arrested. Since he continued to violate this rule, he was arrested.

Whackos like this who worship the false idols of two pillars of stone should be incarcerated. One of the Commandments itself forbids worship of false idols. This guy and his followers are lawbreakers and I'm glad they were arrested.

Noone holding a sign outside the lines was arrested.

The restoration of Israel is clear.

The restoration of the Roman Empire is a good probable interpretation. However, the EU being that empire is a speculation.

The Roman Empire proper was: Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Greece, Balkans, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia.

I've probably left a few out. It struck me that it's power stemmed from its total control of the Mediterranean basin. It really didn't extend north of the Rhine River.

So, what you're saying is that there should be public areas that are "non-free speech zones." Do I have that correct?

Do you support the zones of "non-free speech" around abortion clinics?

Well well well. It seems my "I told you" post is coming a lot sooner than expected.

I'll leave it to y'all to explain to the FReepers on this thread why these people should be arrested for holding signs and protesting where the government says they can't. Have fun! Don't much like the taste of your own medicine do you?

For the uninformed, the people I pinged argued on this thread that anti-Bush protesters should be removed from a street near a presidential motorcade by the SS because of the content of the signs they held.

And in this case, we have Ten Commandments supporters being arrested for holding protest signs near the Supremes.

Interesting nick and it shows you to be a disruptor.

Wait, wait, wait, wait. A "disrupter" simply because he refuses to walk lock step with the Bible Thumpers? I've been to several Freeps over the years, including the WTO Freep in NYC, and the number one rule is show respect for LEO. If they ask you to move, then move, and if they ask you not to do something, then don't it. These people were looking for trouble just like the leftist wackos at the WTO protests, and they were given plenty of oppurtunity to avoid arrest, but chose arrest to make a point. They got exactly what they asked for and deserved no less.

I have mixed views on this.

Law enforcement has a right to politely set up police lines when public events are taking place or anticipated disorder is being prevented.

Going into a church or too close to a church where a service is taking place carrying a political poster, even if that message consists of the Ten Commandments, is an infringement on the right of people to practice religion.

I agree that the law is unevenly and stupidly applied against Christians, pro-lifers, and conservatives; but the remedy to that is not to disobey the law. Or if you do disobey the law for what you consider to be a good reason, you have to expect to pay the penalty. That's an elementary aspect of civil disobedience.

I wouldn't want someone waving a sign in my face with a fear of violence overhead.

That is the victim mentality. A percieved 'victim' who doesn't like what someone's sign says to a policeman, "He scares me.". The 'victim's' perceptions whether legitimate or not are then used as justification for prior restraint against free speech for anyone with an objectionable message. This effectivly repeals the First Amendment.

Example:
Million Moron Marcher: "Guns are violent. That man with the 2nd Amendment sign, he scares me. Tell him to put that sign down. If he doesn't have him arrested."

Policeman: "As you wish, mam."

You are being purposefully ambiguous in order to avoid debating the real issue. Everytime someone gets close to defeating your argument, you retreat to another position.

The problem is not the sign; it's the proximity to the intended target.

In most areas that involve security concerns, objects that can be used as weapons are NOT allowed. This includes signs on sticks or poles. Normally, signs without sticks or poles are not a problem whatsoever.

I have a hunch that this was the case here.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.