Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Hadenuf
"The fact of the matter is the *only* reason he came out with this when he did is because he got bagged!"

Yes. I acknowledged this.

"If this would have been Clinton or some other liberal screw worm idiot, you'd be creating dangerous winds by flapping your gums about how much of a sawed off drug using rat he is.... "

I was already accused of this, and already denied it. I don't need drug charges to accuse Clinton for being off a "sawed off rat" (dunno what that means but it sounds appropriately insulting).

What I -do- believe is that if Clinton were accused of using, he'd deny it. Oh, wait a minute! He WAS accused of it! But we should respect him for admitting it, because he only denied inhaaaaaling. Riiiiight.

If he'd actually admitted to just plain out smoking pot, it wouldn't have changed my mind about him at all. Actually I would've respected him for admitting it. Too bad you can't understand that.

Tell me, when Clinton admitted to smoking pot (but "didn't inhale"), were you calling democrats and calling them baboon brains?

Yes, Clinton has strongly signed tougher laws against marijuana, and that's a whole lot worse than talking from a microphone. Plus, he slammed users AFTER doing the drugs, not before.

Come on, tell me why what Clinton did was okay.

Qwinn
1,094 posted on 10/10/2003 4:23:01 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1091 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn
Come on, tell me why what Clinton did was okay.

Huh?

Try and stay on track. LOL!

1,096 posted on 10/10/2003 4:24:35 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson