Replies

Does your kindhearted support for Rush Limbaugh's addiction to 'hillbilly heroin' pills mean that we won't be seeing you in the 'War On (some) Drugs' threads anymore calling for the execution of people caught with more than an ounce of marijuana?

Don't say that you've never said it, because you have.

Does your kindhearted support for Rush Limbaugh's addiction to 'hillbilly heroin' pills mean that we won't be seeing you in the 'War On (some) Drugs' threads anymore calling for the execution of people caught with more than an ounce of marijuana?

Don't say that you've never said it, because you have

IMO, you're wrong. Go right ahead and look through the FR archives.

Sorry to be a skunk in your, Rush bashing and kicking when he is down, garden party.

man, I'm just browsing through this thread, and it really struck me: what a bizarre situation this is.

First of all, the one thing (or one main thing) that seems to divide Freepers is the WOD. For me, I can see both sides; from a personal standpoint, I'd love to have free access to narcotics... ;); on the other hand, I have young children and I cannot stand, for example, the Canadian government's position on marijuana. I was young once and I don't want the message for kids to be: don't worry, be happy, no problem!

Second of all, this situation involves a conservative "icon," to use an overused phrase. I think we need to give Rush a break; please consider how much he has done for the conservative cause.

If you can't think of that--just remember: the liberals love it when we devour our own. In fact, we're experts at that.

There is no one they would rather have us "devour," so to speak, than Rush. They want him silenced. So, if you can't think of any other reason not to turn your back on him, think of that one.