[Peace will be here soon]

What I found amusing about this article is this guy kind of rips Novak for disclosing the name of this woman, and then, in the same article he drops the name of a CIA front company ("Brewster-Jennings & Associates, a C.I.A. front company"), and, the name of another possible CIA agent that trained with this woman ("classmates at the C.I.A. training "farm," Jim Marcinkowski, recalls"). I my be knit picking a bit here, but didn`t he just do exactly what he accused Novak of doing?

[norton]

Depends on his source.

Sounds to me more like Mr. Marcinkowski had an overwhelming need to stick his name into the news; kind of like a guy standing behind the candidate and mugging at the camera.
Not a lawyer or such, but I'd imagine that if Marcinkowski used those names in the interview, with Novak's story already in the media, the author felt it was 'a news story' rather than a new disclosure.
In any event, I doubt the author is in trouble. In part because the article made Ms. Plame into a lefty Emma Peal.

And, in case my analysis is correct, I'll say "Marcinkowski" one more time and link it to "Novak" (not to mention Dianna Rigg). There, Mr. Marcinkowski, you've made the big time on Free Republic.