Skip to comments.
Rush takes responsibility -- but will he learn forgiveness? (BARRRRRFFFFFF!!!!!)
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| October 12, 2003
| RICHARD 'DOPEY' ROEPER SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
Posted on 10/12/2003 5:05:07 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Roeper's the same guy who was practically dancing a jig when he learned of Rush's hearing loss. And somehow, I bet he actually believes that Rush is serious when he says, "I'll tell you everything you need to know. You never need read a newspaper again. I'll read them for you and tell you what to think."
To: All
Donate to Free Republic, and Save Larry The Lobster!!!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
10/12/2003 5:07:37 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Chi-townChief
hefty garbage bag-size vomit alert
3
posted on
10/12/2003 5:09:09 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
To: Chi-townChief
This article is full of fibs.
4
posted on
10/12/2003 5:10:38 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(Fetch this!)
To: Chi-townChief
Thanks to this POS reporter, I just signed up for Rush24... so TAKE THAT. You know what I hate? I hate people who are JEALOUS. They lie in wait for something bad to happen to you. They're like ANIMALS.
I really hate liberals.
5
posted on
10/12/2003 5:10:49 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
To: Chi-townChief
Let me be more specific. If Al Franken (or Hillary Clinton, or Jesse Jackson) announced an addiction to painkillers and issued a statement about going into rehab, would Limbaugh publicly wish this person well and tell his listeners to say a prayer -- or would he mock their moment of darkness and use it for comedic purposes and political ammunition? He would probably mock their moment of darkness and use it for comedic purposes and political ammunition. You know. Kinda like what you are doing now.
Or are you going to deny that the reference to the banner ad for Stresstabs was used for comedic purposes?
To: Thebaddog
wow did you take meds before reading this article? so terse and calm a response... now I feel humbled :-)
7
posted on
10/12/2003 5:12:05 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
To: Chi-townChief
More reason to avoid purchasing much of Chicago's press...
Prairie
8
posted on
10/12/2003 5:14:24 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I'm a monthly donor to FR. And proud of it!)
To: Chi-townChief
Rush Limbaugh, Oct. 5, 1995, on the Excellence In Broadcasting network. Rush Limbaugh's fans often tell me I don't have the right to criticize "El Rushbo" because I don't regularly tune in his program. Granted, I often go weeks without listening to Limbaugh, but I do check out his show from time to time,...
Try 8 years, given the reference above! Anyway, there's a big difference between "having a nose like a Hoover" and becoming addicted to a prescription drug in the course of medical treatment for chronic pain. In the quote above, Rush was referring to the former. As far as the latter is concerned, there's about as much moral baggage involved as in getting a stroke as a consequence of open heart surgery. Both are understandable risks run for legitimate reasons. Leave it to a liberal to be incapable of acknowledging, much less understanding, the difference.
9
posted on
10/12/2003 5:17:43 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Chi-townChief
What amazes me in all the brouhaha about Rush is that so few seem to consider that the route a person takes to drug addiction. I think there is a major difference between taking drugs for pain relief and becoming dependent vs taking drugs for recreational purposes and becoming dependent.
10
posted on
10/12/2003 5:21:49 PM PDT
by
knuthom
To: aruanan
Agreed:
"Gary Bauer, president of the conservative organization American Values, drew a distinction between a crack addict and Limbaughs brand of addiction. From a moral standpoint, theres a difference between people who go out and seek a high and get addicted and the millions of Americans dealing with pain who inadvertently get addicted, Bauer told NEWSWEEK.
How many made fun oo JFK. And he was a presidnet on anti-psychotics during the Cuban Missles crises!
Factoid:
-The upper 1% of wage earners pay 37.4% of all taxes and account for only 20.8% of all income in the US
-The top 10% of wage earners pay 67% while earning only 46%
-The lowest 50% of wage earners paid only 4% pay while earning 14% of total income
[ Stock bubble burst reduced tax revenue because the tax base is too heavily dependent on the rich as they pay almost twice their share. ]
11
posted on
10/12/2003 5:25:30 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(Democrats’ life philosophy is so flawed they need my money to make their lives work.)
To: knuthom
agreed:
If all in this nation that are on Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Effexor and Celexa were made to stop taking thier meds the nation would stop while we awaited thier detoxification!
12
posted on
10/12/2003 5:28:13 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(Democrats’ life philosophy is so flawed they need my money to make their lives work.)
To: knuthom
I think there is a major difference between taking drugs for pain relief and becoming dependent vs taking drugs for recreational purposes and becoming dependent. And that is the line of thinking that gets a lot of addicts back into trouble. Ask anyone who's been through AA or any of the other roads taken to overcome addiction.
13
posted on
10/12/2003 5:31:08 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: aruanan
Anyway, there's a big difference between "having a nose like a Hoover" and becoming addicted to a prescription drug in the course of medical treatment for chronic pain. What difference is that? Is Rush any less addicted, or is he a higher class of addict because his drug of choice was an opiate rather than cocaine?
14
posted on
10/12/2003 5:33:53 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Chi-townChief
There's nothing better than a hypocrite exposed! I've searched the net and couldn't find any drug comments from Rush after 1995, so assume he wasn't as commited to WOD as some are imagining. Before '95, it was '93, but this is as close to hypocrisy the liberals can get. What is worse than Rush's addiction is the downright hatred and animousity from the so-called 'it's for the children' crowd. They are the crowd who said it was ok for Bill to make time for Monica while he's talking war on the phone. It's ok for Willie to give speeches in public while liberals pretend his red bulbous nose isn't visible. So much hypocrisy from the left and it's going to bite them in the butt.....again. Clinton might have gotten away with being a lowlife but those who supported him are not having his luck.
15
posted on
10/12/2003 5:34:14 PM PDT
by
Jaidyn
To: cyborg
I could not agree with you more. This article is pure garbage. First of all I really do not look to the Republican Party or politics for a religious experience. Second of all absolutely no one is without sin, meaning that we all have our faults. Third these were not street drugs that we are talking about and he was truly in pain due to an unsucessful surgery so what is one in his situation to do? I listen to Rush quite a bit and he did have compassion for the guy who stole a train in New York City because he wanted to be a train conductor and it was when thetrain was running on time that Metro dtermined that something was definately wrong. Secondly, I felt that he was vey compassionate towards Monica Lewinsky during the impeachment process he talked about being overweight and articulated it very well it was awesome stuff. Also if you listen to people who know him you will hear stories about his kindness and generosity that are very moving. But to say that he is a hypocrite really is totally false and those who say that realy are not listening very well Rush's message is that when times get tough you have to take the bulls by the horn and deal with the situation and that is exactly what he is doing. Finally in all of this I would not be surprised to discover that someone very high up the food chain in the Democratic party was behind this. The timing seems a little odd, secondly one of those rag papers either the Star or The Enquirer do have Clinton operatives working for them look back to the impeachment and you will find that. Even if The Enquirer is the wrong paper it would not be a stretch for that paper to give the story away look at how the New York Times influences the media and there are many industries that work with their competition in some way. Last when I was in college we were reading Marx and raised a question about the historical context in which communism was brought to the world. My liberal commie Professor was not impressed and his response was, "what does Marx's background have to do with the truth of his ideas? To paraphrase that question, "what does Rush's drug adiction have to do with the truth of his ideas?
To: peter the great
I rather buy the Enquirer than the New York SLIMES anyday... The only thing I'd use this issue of Newsweek for is to pick my poodle's crap. I hate snob journalism. Don't know if you listen to Art Bell, but he's back on 770 WABC, Rush's flagship station. His back is worse than Rush's back, and he had the kindest words to say.
BTW that boy who stole the train was from my mother's country, Trinidad. My grandma knew his family and he's a very bright boy. Rush as usual is right. Whenever the train is on time, one has to wonder if it's a two year driving it.
Rush NEVER teased Chelsea Clinton either...
No thanks... I'll keep Rush and the vast right wing conspiracy as opposed to MOVEON and other liberal cesspool dwellers.
GOOD POST btw
17
posted on
10/12/2003 6:01:30 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
To: Catspaw
This is the difference. The recreational addict got addicted doing something completely avoidable. He knew it was bad for him and did it anyway. It was strictly a hedonistic thing.
The medical user starts off doing something that the doctor prescribes to help him. He is not doing it to get high, but to control pain. The intent is completely different, even if the result may be the same.
18
posted on
10/12/2003 6:18:01 PM PDT
by
knuthom
To: Catspaw
What difference is that? Is Rush any less addicted, or is he a higher class of addict because his drug of choice was an opiate rather than cocaine?
It's the difference between accidental homicide and a premeditated murder. You may as well be asking "What difference is that? Is the person any less dead?"
19
posted on
10/12/2003 6:20:13 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: knuthom
The intent is completely different, even if the result may be the same.A good friend of ours failed at rehab the first two or three times because she thought because she was addicted to "prescription" drugs (opiates) that she wasn't as addicted as someone who did cocaine--she did get them "legally," from at least four different doctors in three different cities--in addition, of course, to stealing drugs from friend's medicine cabinets, stealing one doc's prescription pad and a whole lot more. When she finally realized that yes, indeed, she was as addicted as the person who did cocaine was she able to rehab successfully.
20
posted on
10/12/2003 6:28:02 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson