Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Maximilian
Wow. Truly eye-opening and repulsive. Do you know if he publicly repudiated all of this evil?
8 posted on 10/28/2003 2:32:05 PM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Catholicguy
Wow. Truly eye-opening and repulsive. Do you know if he publicly repudiated all of this evil?

Supposedly he now supports the Church teaching on contraception. But he was still working for the infamous and anti-Catholic Rockefeller foundation at the time when he would have run out of opportunities for fatherhood.

The prior FR thread linked above mentions his Templeton prize speech in the 1990s when he was already well into his neo-con phase. He cannot claim to be young and naive (although he was 35 even back in 1968 when he wrote about "intercourse every day or even more often"). That speech is a masterpiece of Straussian misrepresentation which mentions "Jesus" only once, and that within the Straussian Athens-Jerusalem context. He never mentions whether he has any personal faith whatsoever. God forbid the words "Catholic" should come out of his mouth. And this is when he is accepting a prize for "progress in religion." Lately they have been giving that prize to left-wing atheists. Looks like Novak was ahead of the pack once again.

9 posted on 10/28/2003 3:03:04 PM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson