Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hermann the Cherusker
That's because your Bible has expurgated the word "Eucharist" out of its translation.

JW's tell me the same kind of thing about my bible. I don't believe them either.

74 posted on 11/04/2003 10:20:18 AM PST by biblewonk (I must answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: biblewonk
JW's tell me the same kind of thing about my bible. I don't believe them either.

Whom do you "believe" that sanctions the authenticity of your own bible?

SD

79 posted on 11/04/2003 10:31:50 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: biblewonk
...about my bible

The fact is, the only reason you have the New Testament canon is because of the trustworthy teaching authority of the Catholic Church. As Augustine put it, ‘I would not believe in the Gospels were it not for the authority of the Catholic Church’ (Against the Letter of Mani Called "The Foundation" 5:6). Any Christian accepting the authority of the New Testament does so, whether or not he admits it, because he has implicit trust that the Catholic Church made the right decision in determining the canon.

The fact is, the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church to recognize and determine the canon of the New and Old Testaments in the year 382 at the Council of Rome, under Pope Damasus I. This decision was ratified again at the councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397 and 419) and in numerous venues thereafter. You accept exactly the same books of the New Testament that Pope Damasus decreed were canonical, and no others.

Furthermore, one reason you accept the books you do is that they were in the Bible someone gave you when you first became a Christian. You accept them because they were handed on to you. This means you accept the canon of the New Testament that you do because of tradition, because tradition is simply what is handed on to us from those who were in the faith before us. So your knowledge of the exact books that belong in the Bible, such as Philemon and 3 John, rests on tradition rather than on Scripture itself.

The question you have to ask yourself is this: "Where did we get the Bible?" Until you can give a satisfactory answer (and there can really be only one answer) you aren’t in much of a position to rely on the authority of Scripture or to claim that you can be certain that you know how to accurately interpret it.
81 posted on 11/04/2003 10:42:21 AM PST by polemikos (sola scriptura creat hereseos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: biblewonk
That's okay. I don't believe you are a Christian. So all's fair and even.
92 posted on 11/04/2003 11:04:30 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson