To: sinkspur
you accomplished exactly nothingWishful thinking. CP has been discredited, and this article repeatedly revealed for what it is. That is success.
And CP's basic premise has been derailed and forgotten. That is success.
You've chosen your alliances very poorly, sink.
163 posted on
11/17/2003 5:22:13 PM PST by
ckca
To: ckca
You've chosen your alliances very poorly, sink. I don't have any "alliances." CP and I disagree often, especially about Catholicism.
But, you've let others take on the article, while you've whined to mommy.
167 posted on
11/17/2003 5:29:14 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: ckca
Derailed? LOL, you presume that I have some agenda that you were somehow able to stymie by hijacking the thread over to religion, when the real truth is that there is no agenda other than sharing stuff with like minded people. They saw it, we commented, I'm happy.
To: ckca
And CP's basic premise has been derailed and forgotten. That is success. The basic premise has been reinforced with every post.
193 posted on
11/17/2003 5:59:14 PM PST by
wimpycat
("I'm mean, but I make up for it by bein' real healthy.")
To: ckca
Wishful thinking. CP has been discredited, and this article repeatedly revealed for what it is. That is success. And CP's basic premise has been derailed and forgotten. That is success.
CP's premise is very clear and to the point. All you have demonstrated is your inability to present an intelligent argument. Or for that matter any argument at all.
Your posts have shown that Reconstructionism Theology is backed by people with an inability to present an intelligent argument.
214 posted on
11/17/2003 9:03:17 PM PST by
LPM1888
(What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson