[Chancellor Palpatine]

On the justice of stoning

On relegating the religious practices of nonbelievers to second class status or banning it completely, and expecting Christians to march in lockstep

[Precisian]

You miss the same point everybody misses with "Reconstructionism". Here is a thought-experiment to clear things up for you.

If a legal election is held under the terms of our Constitution, and the Federal Judiciary sustains the decision of the ballot by a vote of the majority of the Supreme Court....is this "imposing tyranny?"

Nowhere in any "Reconstructionist" literature does anyone advocate anything but complete legal, open-ballot, judicially sustained voting.

Are you saying you will not defend the tenets of the United States Constitution?

[Law]

Another reason we know this thread was designed primarily to attack and bait conservative Christians is that the thread was posted not in the religion forum, where the most indepth and vigorous discusions of religious articles take place, but in News/Activism, even though it's not news (the article is from 1999) and there's no action for current Freepers.

If this were an isolated incident, one should judge it as a mistake, but as it's part of pattern of such old articles being posted in the News/Activism thread, we must give credit to the poster for deliberate rather than accidental placement.